PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBAX vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBAX achieves a 10.52% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 9.54% return.


BBAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
1.03%
YTD
10.52%
6M
12.09%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
5.02%
10Y*

JEPQ

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.31%
YTD
9.54%
6M
9.75%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
10.52%20.21%2.50%5.60%-4.52%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
9.54%15.18%24.85%36.28%-12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between BBAX and JEPQ is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.60

The correlation between BBAX and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBAX
JEPQ

Financial Services

45.9%
0.4%

Basic Materials

16.0%
1.0%

Real Estate

8.4%
0.2%

Industrials

7.9%
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.9%
12.8%

Healthcare

4.5%
4.4%

Utilities

3.3%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
7.1%

Energy

2.9%
0.4%

Communication Services

2.8%
15.4%

Technology

0.3%
54.0%

Financial Services

BBAX
45.9%
JEPQ
0.4%

Basic Materials

BBAX
16.0%
JEPQ
1.0%

Real Estate

BBAX
8.4%
JEPQ
0.2%

Industrials

BBAX
7.9%
JEPQ
3.1%

Consumer Cyclical

BBAX
4.9%
JEPQ
12.8%

Healthcare

BBAX
4.5%
JEPQ
4.4%

Utilities

BBAX
3.3%
JEPQ
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

BBAX
3.1%
JEPQ
7.1%

Energy

BBAX
2.9%
JEPQ
0.4%

Communication Services

BBAX
2.8%
JEPQ
15.4%

Technology

BBAX
0.3%
JEPQ
54.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBAX vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBAX
BBAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBAXJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.49

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.25

3.31

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.46

16.22

-8.76

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAX and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBAXJEPQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

2.49

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.00

-0.66

Drawdowns

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAX and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBAXJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-20.07%

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-8.82%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.12%

-20.07%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-0.10%

-3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.22%

-3.42%

-3.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

1.79%

+0.92%

Volatility

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.26%. This indicates that BBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBAXJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

1.26%

+3.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.79%

9.07%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.34%

11.73%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.28%

16.61%

+0.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

16.61%

+3.07%

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBAX vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

BBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than JEPQ's 10.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
3.58%3.86%4.13%4.17%5.06%5.47%2.57%4.07%1.36%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.07%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBAX and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBAX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBAX dropped -39.64% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 20.92% vs 13.06% for BBAX. On fees, BBAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 20.92% return vs 13.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 3.58% for BBAX.

BBAX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. BBAX tracks Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBAX and 0.35% for JEPQ.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBAX and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer