PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBAX vs. INDH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBAX vs. INDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBAX achieves a 15.03% return, which is significantly higher than INDH's -6.93% return.


BBAX

1D
-1.35%
1M
6.08%
6M
7.30%
YTD
15.03%
1Y
21.39%
3Y*
13.55%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.20%

INDH

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.07%
6M
-4.34%
YTD
-6.93%
1Y
-2.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
1.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.49M$15.50M$15.90M
$20.02K$17.53K$22.76K

BBAX vs. INDH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
15.03%20.21%3.21%
INDH
WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund
-6.93%6.76%5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between BBAX and INDH is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2024

0.42

BBAX vs. INDH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBAX
INDH

Financial Services

45.5%
24.5%

Basic Materials

16.4%
9.0%

Industrials

8.2%
7.8%

Real Estate

7.6%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
13.4%

Healthcare

4.9%
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
7.3%

Utilities

3.2%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.5%
4.9%

Energy

2.5%
12.3%

Technology

0.2%
8.9%

Financial Services

BBAX
45.5%
INDH
24.5%

Basic Materials

BBAX
16.4%
INDH
9.0%

Industrials

BBAX
8.2%
INDH
7.8%

Real Estate

BBAX
7.6%
INDH
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BBAX
5.7%
INDH
13.4%

Healthcare

BBAX
4.9%
INDH
6.1%

Consumer Defensive

BBAX
3.4%
INDH
7.3%

Utilities

BBAX
3.2%
INDH
5.5%

Communication Services

BBAX
2.5%
INDH
4.9%

Energy

BBAX
2.5%
INDH
12.3%

Technology

BBAX
0.2%
INDH
8.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBAX vs. INDH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBAX
BBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
BBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

INDH
INDH Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
INDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDH Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
INDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDH Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBAX vs. INDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBAXINDHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.98

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

-0.20

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

-0.46

+7.21

BBAX vs. INDH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the INDH Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAX and INDH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBAX vs. INDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, which is greater than INDH's maximum drawdown of -15.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAX and INDH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBAXINDHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-15.05%

-24.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-12.94%

+3.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-9.00%

+7.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.14%

-5.96%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

5.63%

-2.51%

Volatility

BBAX vs. INDH - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund (INDH) at 3.20%. This indicates that BBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBAXINDHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

3.20%

+0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.65%

11.93%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.08%

13.36%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

14.24%

+3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

14.24%

+5.38%

BBAX vs. INDH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INDH's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBAX vs. INDH - Dividend Comparison

BBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than INDH's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
3.53%3.86%4.13%4.17%5.06%5.47%2.57%4.07%1.36%
INDH
WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Fund
5.64%5.25%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBAX and INDH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBAX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to INDH (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBAX dropped -39.64% vs INDH's -15.05%.

On 1-year performance, BBAX leads with 21.39% vs -2.60% for INDH. On fees, BBAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, INDH has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBAX has performed better with a 21.39% return vs -2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for INDH.

INDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 3.53% for BBAX.

BBAX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INDH is India Equities. BBAX tracks Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while INDH tracks WisdomTree India Hedged Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBAX and 0.64% for INDH.

BBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBAX and INDH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer