PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBAX vs. INDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBAX vs. INDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBAX achieves a 16.73% return, which is significantly higher than INDA's -6.92% return.


BBAX

1D
-0.37%
1M
6.67%
6M
7.07%
YTD
16.73%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
6.80%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.38%

INDA

1D
-0.44%
1M
0.86%
6M
-5.86%
YTD
-6.92%
1Y
-4.01%
3Y*
4.80%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
6.58%
ALL TIME*
5.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$14.45M$14.37M$16.01M
$376.57M$306.60M$317.64M

BBAX vs. INDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
16.73%20.21%2.50%5.60%-4.80%5.53%8.02%18.66%-9.65%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
-6.92%2.68%8.63%17.16%-8.94%21.36%14.83%6.49%-5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BBAX and INDA is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2018

0.54

The correlation between BBAX and INDA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBAX vs. INDA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BBAX
INDA

Financial Services

45.5%
30.3%

Basic Materials

16.4%
8.5%

Industrials

8.2%
10.5%

Real Estate

7.6%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
12.3%

Healthcare

4.9%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
5.6%

Utilities

3.2%
4.2%

Communication Services

2.5%
5.0%

Energy

2.5%
8.8%

Technology

0.2%
7.1%

Financial Services

BBAX
45.5%
INDA
30.3%

Basic Materials

BBAX
16.4%
INDA
8.5%

Industrials

BBAX
8.2%
INDA
10.5%

Real Estate

BBAX
7.6%
INDA
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BBAX
5.7%
INDA
12.3%

Healthcare

BBAX
4.9%
INDA
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

BBAX
3.4%
INDA
5.6%

Utilities

BBAX
3.2%
INDA
4.2%

Communication Services

BBAX
2.5%
INDA
5.0%

Energy

BBAX
2.5%
INDA
8.8%

Technology

BBAX
0.2%
INDA
7.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBAX vs. INDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BBAX
BBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

INDA
INDA Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
INDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
INDA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
INDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
INDA Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BBAX vs. INDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BBAXINDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.97

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

-0.23

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.76

-0.49

+7.25

BBAX vs. INDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the INDA Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAX and INDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BBAX vs. INDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum INDA drawdown of -45.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAX and INDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBAXINDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-45.07%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-17.85%

+8.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.12%

-22.72%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.21%

-22.72%

-0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-14.40%

+14.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.13%

-9.65%

+2.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

8.21%

-5.09%

Volatility

BBAX vs. INDA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF (BBAX) and iShares MSCI India ETF (INDA) have volatilities of 4.16% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBAXINDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.98%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.58%

12.89%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

15.14%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

15.47%

+1.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

21.07%

-1.46%

BBAX vs. INDA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than INDA's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

BBAX vs. INDA - Dividend Comparison

BBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, while INDA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBAX
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Developed Asia ex-Japan ETF
3.48%3.86%4.13%4.17%5.06%5.47%2.57%4.07%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INDA
iShares MSCI India ETF
0.00%0.00%0.76%0.16%0.00%6.44%0.27%0.99%0.94%1.09%0.90%1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBAX and INDA have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBAX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to INDA (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBAX dropped -39.64% vs INDA's -45.07%.

On 5-year performance, BBAX leads with 6.80% vs 3.41% for INDA. On fees, BBAX is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, INDA has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBAX has performed better with a 6.80% return vs 3.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBAX is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for INDA.

BBAX has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.00% for INDA.

BBAX is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while INDA is India Equities. BBAX tracks Morningstar Developed Asia Pacific ex-Japan Target Market Exposure Index, while INDA tracks MSCI India Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for BBAX and 0.69% for INDA.

BBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBAX and INDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer