PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBALX vs. NOSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BBALX vs. NOSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX) and Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBALX achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than NOSIX's 10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, BBALX has underperformed NOSIX with an annualized return of 7.05%, while NOSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.48% annualized return.


BBALX

1D
-0.65%
1M
1.96%
YTD
7.50%
6M
8.03%
1Y
17.99%
3Y*
12.49%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
7.05%

NOSIX

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.16%
YTD
10.87%
6M
10.79%
1Y
28.01%
3Y*
22.40%
5Y*
13.82%
10Y*
15.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBALX vs. NOSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBALX
Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund
7.50%14.74%8.00%10.74%-12.79%11.17%6.45%17.62%-7.89%14.18%
NOSIX
Northern Stock Index Fund
10.87%17.83%24.87%26.24%-18.25%28.55%18.33%31.35%-4.54%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BBALX and NOSIX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 1996

0.90

The correlation between BBALX and NOSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBALX vs. NOSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBALX
BBALX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BBALX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBALX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBALX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BBALX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBALX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

NOSIX
NOSIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NOSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NOSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBALX vs. NOSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX) and Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBALXNOSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

3.19

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.71

14.95

-2.24

BBALX vs. NOSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBALX Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the NOSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBALX and NOSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBALXNOSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

2.37

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.81

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.85

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.50

+0.04

Drawdowns

BBALX vs. NOSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBALX drawdown since its inception was -33.24%, smaller than the maximum NOSIX drawdown of -55.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBALX and NOSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBALXNOSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.24%

-55.42%

+22.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-8.89%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.72%

-18.75%

+9.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.75%

-24.54%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.33%

-33.82%

+7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.72%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.49%

-10.33%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.89%

-0.43%

Volatility

BBALX vs. NOSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund (BBALX) is 2.52%, while Northern Stock Index Fund (NOSIX) has a volatility of 2.92%. This indicates that BBALX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBALXNOSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

2.92%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.84%

8.99%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.44%

11.98%

-3.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.91%

17.20%

-7.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.68%

18.21%

-7.53%

BBALX vs. NOSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBALX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than NOSIX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BBALX vs. NOSIX - Dividend Comparison

BBALX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than NOSIX's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBALX
Northern Global Tactical Asset Allocation Fund
2.71%3.11%3.28%3.72%7.22%4.57%6.63%2.15%4.23%3.26%3.01%4.20%
NOSIX
Northern Stock Index Fund
2.66%2.94%2.59%5.02%4.72%3.22%4.00%2.41%4.82%3.13%2.76%3.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


BBALX and NOSIX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NOSIX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to BBALX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBALX dropped -33.24% vs NOSIX's -55.42%.

NOSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBALX and NOSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer