BBAG vs. JEPQ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BBAG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BBAG returned 3.91%/yr vs 19.79%/yr for JEPQ. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BBAG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.

Performance

BBAG vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBAG achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly lower than JEPQ's 7.85% return.

BBAG

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 0.63%
• 1Y: 4.36%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: -0.02%
• 10Y*: —

JEPQ

• 1D: -2.48%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 6M: 7.02%
• 1Y: 25.10%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBAG vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.46%	7.27%	1.26%	5.41%	-3.63%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	7.85%	15.18%	24.85%	36.28%	-11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between BBAG and JEPQ is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022	0.17

Return for Risk

BBAG vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBAG

BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 33
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 32

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 63
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBAG vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BBAG	JEPQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	1.93	-0.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.57	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.38	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.58	2.86	-1.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.42	13.55	-9.14

BBAG vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAG and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BBAG vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAG drawdown since its inception was -18.73%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAG and JEPQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBAG	JEPQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.73%	-20.07%	+1.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.78%	-8.82%	+6.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.18%	-20.07%	+13.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.56%	-2.48%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.20%	-3.40%	-2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.99%	1.86%	-0.87%

Volatility

BBAG vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) is 1.13%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that BBAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBAG	JEPQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.13%	6.27%	-5.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	10.58%	-7.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.89%	13.08%	-9.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.93%	16.79%	-10.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.79%	16.79%	-11.00%

BBAG vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBAG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBAG vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

BBAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than JEPQ's 10.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.35%	4.29%	4.25%	3.60%	2.23%	1.44%	2.26%	2.92%	0.16%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.22%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBAG and JEPQ in my portfolio?

BBAG and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BBAG or JEPQ?

JEPQ has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to BBAG (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBAG dropped -18.73% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

Which ETF is better, BBAG or JEPQ?

On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 19.79% vs 3.91% for BBAG. On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BBAG has been the lower-risk option at 1.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBAG or JEPQ?

Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 19.79% return vs 3.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBAG or JEPQ?

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBAG or JEPQ?

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.22%, compared with 4.35% for BBAG.

What is the main difference between BBAG and JEPQ?

BBAG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. BBAG tracks Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index, while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BBAG and 0.35% for JEPQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.