PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBAG vs. IBCA
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BBAG vs. IBCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BBAG vs. IBCA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBAG achieves a 0.11% return, which is significantly higher than IBCA's -0.39% return.


BBAG

1D
0.30%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
0.11%
6M
1.03%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*

IBCA

1D
0.67%
1M
-2.00%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
0.76%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BBAG vs. IBCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBAG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCA's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BBAG vs. IBCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBAG
BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCA
IBCA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IBCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCA Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBAG vs. IBCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBAGIBCADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.01

1.02

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.71

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.90

5.77

-0.87

BBAG vs. IBCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is comparable to the IBCA Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAG and IBCA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBAGIBCADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

1.02

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.13

-0.81

Correlation

The correlation between BBAG and IBCA is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BBAG vs. IBCA - Dividend Comparison

BBAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than IBCA's 4.01% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBAG
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.32%4.29%4.25%3.60%2.23%1.44%2.26%2.92%0.16%
IBCA
iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF
4.01%3.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BBAG vs. IBCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAG drawdown since its inception was -18.73%, which is greater than IBCA's maximum drawdown of -3.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAG and IBCA.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BBAGIBCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.73%

-3.48%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.61%

-3.48%

+0.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.90%

-2.00%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-0.70%

-5.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.03%

-0.07%

Volatility

BBAG vs. IBCA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) is 1.83%, while iShares iBonds Dec 2035 Term Corporate ETF (IBCA) has a volatility of 2.48%. This indicates that BBAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BBAGIBCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.83%

2.48%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

3.47%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.47%

5.88%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.91%

5.91%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.84%

5.91%

-0.07%