BBAG vs. DDV
BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. BBAG is passively managed, while DDV is actively managed. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BBAG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
BBAG vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BBAG achieves a -0.66% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.35% return.
BBAG
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- -0.66%
- 1Y
- 1.77%
- 3Y*
- 3.84%
- 5Y*
- -0.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.71%
DDV
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.14M | $3.37M | $5.23M | |
| $74.78K | $50.90K | $102.48K |
BBAG vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.66% | 0.14% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.35% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between BBAG and DDV is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BBAG vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
BBAG
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBAG vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BBAG | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.37 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BBAG vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BBAG drawdown since its inception was -18.73%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAG and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BBAG | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.73% | -1.92% | -16.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.65% | -0.29% | -3.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.15% | -0.34% | -5.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | — | — |
Volatility
BBAG vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BBAG | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 2.64% | +1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 2.64% | +3.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.76% | 2.64% | +3.12% |
BBAG vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
BBAG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BBAG vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
BBAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than DDV's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.05% | 4.29% | 4.25% | 3.60% | 2.23% | 1.44% | 2.26% | 2.92% | 0.16% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.62% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BBAG and DDV have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.
BBAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 1.62% for DDV.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BBAG and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for BBAG and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer