BBAG vs. BAMB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) and BAMB (Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. BBAG is passively managed, while BAMB is actively managed. Over the past year, BBAG returned 5.12% vs 2.78% for BAMB. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BBAG charges 0.03%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for BAMB.

Performance

BBAG vs. BAMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBAG achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly higher than BAMB's -0.85% return.

BBAG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: —

BAMB

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -0.17%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 2.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBAG vs. BAMB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.17%	7.27%	1.26%	6.84%
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	-0.85%	6.15%	3.01%	2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BBAG and BAMB is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2023	0.90

The correlation between BBAG and BAMB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BBAG vs. BAMB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BBAG	BAMB
Communication Services	46.6%	-
Technology	12.0%	-
Real Estate	6.8%	-
Financial Services	6.5%	98.5%
Healthcare	2.6%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.6%	-
Industrials	1.6%	-
Energy	1.2%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	-
Basic Materials	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

BBAG vs. BAMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBAG

BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 37
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

BAMB

BAMB Risk / Return Rank: 21
BAMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
BAMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
BAMB Omega Ratio Rank: 20
BAMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
BAMB Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBAG vs. BAMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) and Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BBAG	BAMB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	0.72	+0.60
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	1.08	+0.88
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.12	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	0.83	+1.02
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.54	2.43	+3.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BBAG vs. BAMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the BAMB Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBAG and BAMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BBAG	BAMB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.31	0.72	+0.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	1.03	-0.71

Drawdowns

BBAG vs. BAMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBAG drawdown since its inception was -18.73%, which is greater than BAMB's maximum drawdown of -4.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBAG and BAMB.

Drawdown Indicators

	BBAG	BAMB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.73%	-4.48%	-14.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.78%	-3.37%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.84%	-2.51%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-1.01%	-5.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.15%	-0.22%

Volatility

BBAG vs. BAMB - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) has a higher volatility of 1.24% compared to Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF (BAMB) at 1.18%. This indicates that BBAG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BBAG	BAMB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.24%	1.18%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	2.72%	+0.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.92%	3.90%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.93%	4.06%	+1.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.80%	4.06%	+1.74%

BBAG vs. BAMB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BBAG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BAMB's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

BBAG vs. BAMB - Dividend Comparison

BBAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, more than BAMB's 2.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BAMB Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF	2.95%	2.85%	2.90%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.37%	4.29%	4.25%	3.60%	2.23%	1.44%	2.26%	2.92%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BBAG and BAMB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, BBAG and BAMB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BBAG or BAMB?

BBAG has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to BAMB (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBAG dropped -18.73% vs BAMB's -4.48%.

Which ETF is better, BBAG or BAMB?

On 1-year performance, BBAG leads with 5.12% vs 2.78% for BAMB. On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BBAG or BAMB?

Over the 1-year period, BBAG has performed better with a 5.12% return vs 2.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BBAG or BAMB?

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for BAMB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BBAG or BAMB?

BBAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 2.95% for BAMB.

What is the main difference between BBAG and BAMB?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Brookstone. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for BBAG and 1.09% for BAMB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.