BAX vs. CNH
BAX (Baxter International Inc.) and CNH (CNH Industrial NV) are both stocks. BAX operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while CNH operates in Farm & Heavy Construction Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BAX returned -6.73%/yr vs 5.89%/yr for CNH. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BAX vs. CNH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAX achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than CNH's 20.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BAX has underperformed CNH with an annualized return of -6.73%, while CNH has yielded a comparatively higher 5.89% annualized return.
BAX
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 11.61%
- YTD
- -2.88%
- 6M
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- -37.86%
- 3Y*
- -21.84%
- 5Y*
- -24.25%
- 10Y*
- -6.73%
CNH
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 9.07%
- YTD
- 20.90%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- -11.25%
- 3Y*
- -4.62%
- 5Y*
- -7.04%
- 10Y*
- 5.89%
BAX vs. CNH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAX Baxter International Inc. | -2.88% | -33.28% | -22.40% | -21.91% | -39.58% | 8.48% | -2.95% | 28.40% | 2.89% | 47.30% |
CNH CNH Industrial NV | 20.90% | -17.10% | -3.12% | -22.01% | -15.74% | 52.59% | 16.73% | 21.64% | -30.31% | 57.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAX and CNH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.29 |
The correlation between BAX and CNH shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (10 years) to 0.41 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BAX:
$9.55B
CNH:
$13.73B
BAX:
-$1.74
CNH:
$0.32
BAX:
0.84
CNH:
0.76
BAX:
1.58
CNH:
1.75
BAX:
$11.32B
CNH:
$18.09B
BAX:
$3.41B
CNH:
$4.45B
BAX:
$399.00M
CNH:
$2.09B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAX vs. CNH — Risk / Return Rank
BAX
CNH
BAX vs. CNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baxter International Inc. (BAX) and CNH Industrial NV (CNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAX | CNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 0.97 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.34 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.11 | -0.54 | -0.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAX | CNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 | -0.32 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.72 | -0.20 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.23 | 0.16 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.03 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
BAX vs. CNH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAX drawdown since its inception was -81.15%, which is greater than CNH's maximum drawdown of -65.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAX and CNH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAX | CNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.15% | -65.82% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.79% | -33.19% | -16.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.90% | -37.66% | -28.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.61% | -47.76% | -32.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.15% | -65.82% | -15.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.87% | -36.84% | -41.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.63% | -28.58% | +6.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 34.06% | 20.72% | +13.34% |
Volatility
BAX vs. CNH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baxter International Inc. (BAX) is 9.66%, while CNH Industrial NV (CNH) has a volatility of 14.06%. This indicates that BAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAX | CNH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.66% | 14.06% | -4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.84% | 28.65% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.13% | 35.42% | +10.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.68% | 35.77% | -2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.23% | 36.69% | -7.46% |
Dividends
BAX vs. CNH - Dividend Comparison
BAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than CNH's 0.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAX Baxter International Inc. | 1.08% | 2.72% | 3.57% | 3.00% | 2.26% | 1.26% | 1.19% | 1.02% | 1.11% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 87.05% |
CNH CNH Industrial NV | 0.91% | 2.71% | 4.15% | 3.25% | 1.88% | 0.68% | 0.00% | 1.85% | 1.87% | 1.64% | 1.50% | 2.92% |
Financials
BAX vs. CNH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Baxter International Inc. and CNH Industrial NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BAX vs. CNH - Profitability Comparison
BAX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported a gross profit of 891.00M and revenue of 2.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.0%.
CNH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BAX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported an operating income of -42.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in an operating margin of -1.6%.
CNH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
BAX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baxter International Inc. reported a net income of 190.00M and revenue of 2.70B, resulting in a net margin of 7.0%.
CNH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNH Industrial NV reported a net income of 17.00M and revenue of 3.83B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BAX and CNH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNH has higher volatility (14.06%) compared to BAX (9.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAX dropped -81.15% vs CNH's -65.82%.
CNH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.32 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAX and CNH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer