BATEX vs. NHMFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BATEX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio) and NHMFX (Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 5 years, BATEX returned 0.76%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NHMFX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BATEX charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for NHMFX.

Performance

BATEX vs. NHMFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATEX achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly lower than NHMFX's 3.20% return.

BATEX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 2.73%
• 6M: 2.97%
• 1Y: 7.95%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 3.09%

NHMFX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.32%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 3.90%
• 1Y: 10.11%
• 3Y*: 4.80%
• 5Y*: 1.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATEX vs. NHMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BATEX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio	2.73%	3.22%	4.74%	6.45%	-14.23%	8.28%	5.77%	10.92%	1.75%	8.76%
NHMFX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6	3.20%	3.21%	5.23%	6.74%	-14.90%	9.94%	3.33%	12.18%	2.05%	12.17%

Correlation

The correlation between BATEX and NHMFX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2016	0.82

The correlation between BATEX and NHMFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BATEX vs. NHMFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATEX

BATEX Risk / Return Rank: 51
BATEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BATEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BATEX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BATEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BATEX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

NHMFX

NHMFX Risk / Return Rank: 61
NHMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NHMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
NHMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
NHMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
NHMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATEX vs. NHMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BATEX	NHMFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.25	-0.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.60	-0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.51	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	2.83	-0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	8.46	-0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BATEX vs. NHMFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the NHMFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATEX and NHMFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATEX	NHMFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	2.25	-0.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.15	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.50	+0.13

Drawdowns

BATEX vs. NHMFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATEX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum NHMFX drawdown of -22.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATEX and NHMFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATEX	NHMFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.90%	-22.25%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.14%	-3.58%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.30%	-10.89%	+2.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.90%	-21.55%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-4.87%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	1.19%	-0.14%

Volatility

BATEX vs. NHMFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) is 1.38%, while Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6 (NHMFX) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that BATEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NHMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATEX	NHMFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	1.55%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	3.16%	-0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88%	4.52%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.78%	6.87%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.90%	6.76%	-0.86%

BATEX vs. NHMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATEX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than NHMFX's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BATEX vs. NHMFX - Dividend Comparison

BATEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than NHMFX's 6.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATEX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio	5.07%	5.01%	3.74%	2.98%	5.41%	3.29%	3.50%	3.80%	4.75%	2.88%	0.98%	0.13%
NHMFX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class R6	6.13%	6.59%	5.35%	6.99%	5.68%	4.71%	5.05%	5.03%	5.46%	5.37%	2.52%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATEX and NHMFX in my portfolio?

BATEX and NHMFX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BATEX or NHMFX?

NHMFX has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to BATEX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATEX dropped -19.90% vs NHMFX's -22.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NHMFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.