BATEX vs. FQCHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BATEX (BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio) and FQCHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH) are both High Yield Muni funds. Over the past 5 years, BATEX returned 0.76%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for FQCHX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BATEX charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQCHX.

Performance

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATEX achieves a 2.73% return, which is significantly higher than FQCHX's 2.42% return.

BATEX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 2.73%
• 6M: 2.97%
• 1Y: 7.95%
• 3Y*: 4.86%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 3.09%

FQCHX

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 2.42%
• 6M: 3.40%
• 1Y: 8.08%
• 3Y*: 6.48%
• 5Y*: 1.41%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BATEX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio	2.73%	3.22%	4.74%	6.45%	-14.23%	8.28%	5.77%	4.03%
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH	2.42%	4.96%	8.85%	4.90%	-13.94%	6.00%	4.25%	4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BATEX and FQCHX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019	0.78

The correlation between BATEX and FQCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BATEX vs. FQCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATEX

BATEX Risk / Return Rank: 51
BATEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
BATEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BATEX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BATEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BATEX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FQCHX

FQCHX Risk / Return Rank: 68
FQCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FQCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FQCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FQCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FQCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BATEX	FQCHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.33	-0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.23	3.86	-0.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.55	-0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	3.04	-0.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	10.70	-3.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FQCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATEX and FQCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BATEX	FQCHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	2.33	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13	0.25	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.43	+0.20

Drawdowns

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATEX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum FQCHX drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATEX and FQCHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BATEX	FQCHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.90%	-21.05%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.14%	-2.64%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.30%	-8.54%	+0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.90%	-21.05%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.03%	-5.62%	+1.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.05%	0.75%	+0.30%

Volatility

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) have volatilities of 1.38% and 1.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BATEX	FQCHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	1.32%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	2.60%	+0.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.88%	3.47%	+0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.78%	5.65%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.90%	6.57%	-0.67%

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATEX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FQCHX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Dividend Comparison

BATEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than FQCHX's 5.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BATEX BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio	5.07%	5.01%	3.74%	2.98%	5.41%	3.29%	3.50%	3.80%	4.75%	2.88%	0.98%	0.13%
FQCHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH	5.48%	7.32%	6.12%	3.92%	4.22%	3.39%	3.35%	3.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BATEX and FQCHX in my portfolio?

BATEX and FQCHX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BATEX or FQCHX?

BATEX has higher volatility (1.38%) compared to FQCHX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATEX dropped -19.90% vs FQCHX's -21.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.