PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BATEX vs. FQCHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BATEX achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly higher than FQCHX's 3.12% return.


BATEX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.21%
6M
3.25%
YTD
3.87%
1Y
8.76%
3Y*
5.65%
5Y*
0.61%
10Y*
3.00%

FQCHX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.69%
6M
2.88%
YTD
3.12%
1Y
8.72%
3Y*
6.57%
5Y*
1.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BATEX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio
3.87%3.22%4.74%6.45%-14.23%8.28%5.77%4.12%
FQCHX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH
3.12%4.96%8.85%4.90%-13.94%6.00%4.25%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between BATEX and FQCHX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019

0.78

The correlation between BATEX and FQCHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BATEX vs. FQCHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BATEX
BATEX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BATEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BATEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FQCHX
FQCHX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FQCHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQCHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQCHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FQCHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQCHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BATEXFQCHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.62

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

3.23

-0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

13.63

-4.13

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BATEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the FQCHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BATEX and FQCHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BATEX drawdown since its inception was -19.90%, smaller than the maximum FQCHX drawdown of -21.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BATEX and FQCHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BATEXFQCHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.90%

-21.05%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.14%

-2.64%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.82%

-8.54%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-21.05%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.46%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-5.54%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.67%

+0.27%

Volatility

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio (BATEX) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH (FQCHX) at 0.69%. This indicates that BATEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FQCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BATEXFQCHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.69%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

2.60%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

3.40%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.78%

5.65%

+0.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.89%

6.52%

-0.63%

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BATEX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than FQCHX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BATEX vs. FQCHX - Dividend Comparison

BATEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, less than FQCHX's 5.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATEX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series E Portfolio
5.01%5.01%3.74%2.98%5.41%3.29%3.50%3.80%4.75%2.88%0.98%0.13%
FQCHX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH
5.48%7.32%6.12%3.92%4.22%3.39%3.35%3.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BATEX and FQCHX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BATEX has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to FQCHX (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BATEX dropped -19.90% vs FQCHX's -21.05%.

FQCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BATEX and FQCHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer