PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BASMX vs. FGLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BASMX vs. FGLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares (BASMX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BASMX achieves a 11.60% return, which is significantly higher than FGLGX's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BASMX has underperformed FGLGX with an annualized return of 14.79%, while FGLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.45% annualized return.


BASMX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.66%
YTD
11.60%
6M
11.46%
1Y
28.31%
3Y*
21.93%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
14.79%

FGLGX

1D
-0.24%
1M
3.30%
YTD
10.11%
6M
12.09%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
26.56%
5Y*
16.96%
10Y*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BASMX vs. FGLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BASMX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares
11.60%16.81%23.46%25.63%-19.32%25.26%20.37%30.71%-5.57%20.65%
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
10.11%28.57%27.45%24.80%-7.23%26.53%10.01%32.37%-8.95%16.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BASMX and FGLGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.92

The correlation between BASMX and FGLGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BASMX vs. FGLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BASMX
BASMX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FGLGX
FGLGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FGLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BASMX vs. FGLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares (BASMX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BASMXFGLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.50

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.07

16.03

-0.96

BASMX vs. FGLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BASMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FGLGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BASMX and FGLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BASMXFGLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.70

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

1.01

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.90

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.88

-0.07

Drawdowns

BASMX vs. FGLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BASMX drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FGLGX drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BASMX and FGLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BASMXFGLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.95%

-36.42%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-9.43%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.32%

-18.75%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.12%

-21.21%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.95%

-36.42%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.59%

-3.78%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

2.06%

-0.12%

Volatility

BASMX vs. FGLGX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares (BASMX) and Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund (FGLGX) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BASMXFGLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.89%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

9.34%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.14%

12.27%

-0.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.38%

16.89%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

18.37%

+0.04%

BASMX vs. FGLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BASMX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than FGLGX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

BASMX vs. FGLGX - Dividend Comparison

BASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than FGLGX's 8.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BASMX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Investor A Shares
0.78%0.86%0.99%1.19%1.33%1.33%1.20%1.90%2.18%1.93%1.37%0.00%
FGLGX
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock Fund
8.94%9.84%7.99%5.29%6.55%9.22%5.36%7.25%12.29%4.61%1.69%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, BASMX and FGLGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BASMX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FGLGX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BASMX dropped -34.95% vs FGLGX's -36.42%.

FGLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BASMX and FGLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer