BAPR vs. SFLR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BAPR is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. BAPR is passively managed, while SFLR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, BAPR returned 14.48%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for SFLR. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.

Performance

BAPR vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAPR achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.43% return.

BAPR

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -0.06%
• YTD: 10.04%
• 6M: 10.03%
• 1Y: 18.64%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 10.86%
• 10Y*: —

SFLR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 15.38%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAPR vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	10.04%	8.28%	15.95%	23.16%	1.46%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	3.43%	13.29%	19.99%	21.20%	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BAPR and SFLR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.89

The correlation between BAPR and SFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BAPR vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAPR

BAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

SFLR

SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 49
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAPR vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAPR	SFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.24	1.59	+1.64
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.31	2.15	+3.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.30	+0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.69	2.27	+7.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	47.41	8.91	+38.50

BAPR vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is higher than the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAPR and SFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BAPR vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAPR drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAPR and SFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAPR	SFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.91%	-12.13%	-11.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.93%	-6.79%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.58%	-12.13%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.93%	-2.61%	+1.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-1.75%	-0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.39%	1.73%	-1.34%

Volatility

BAPR vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) is 2.06%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that BAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAPR	SFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.06%	4.37%	-2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.91%	7.51%	-2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.79%	9.72%	-3.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.51%	10.32%	+1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.09%	10.32%	+2.77%

BAPR vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAPR vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

BAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SFLR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	0.33%	0.33%	0.42%	1.16%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAPR and SFLR in my portfolio?

BAPR and SFLR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAPR or SFLR?

SFLR has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to BAPR (2.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAPR dropped -23.91% vs SFLR's -12.13%.

Which ETF is better, BAPR or SFLR?

On 3-year performance, SFLR leads with 14.80% vs 14.48% for BAPR. On fees, BAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, BAPR has been the lower-risk option at 2.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAPR or SFLR?

Over the 3-year period, SFLR has performed better with a 14.80% return vs 14.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAPR or SFLR?

BAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAPR or SFLR?

SFLR has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for BAPR.

What is the main difference between BAPR and SFLR?

BAPR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while SFLR is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BAPR and 0.89% for SFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.