BAPR vs. BUFF
BAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator - BAPR tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April while BUFF tracks the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, BAPR returned 11.17%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAPR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
BAPR vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAPR achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly higher than BUFF's 5.42% return.
BAPR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 10.81%
- 6M
- 11.74%
- 1Y
- 20.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.17%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
BAPR vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 10.81% | 8.28% | 15.95% | 23.16% | -7.04% | 12.58% | 6.19% | 10.49% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 16.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAPR and BUFF is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between BAPR and BUFF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
BAPR vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BAPR
BUFF
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
BAPR
BUFF
Financial Services
BAPR
BUFF
Communication Services
BAPR
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
BAPR
BUFF
Healthcare
BAPR
BUFF
Industrials
BAPR
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
BAPR
BUFF
Energy
BAPR
BUFF
Utilities
BAPR
BUFF
Real Estate
BAPR
BUFF
Basic Materials
BAPR
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAPR vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
BAPR
BUFF
BAPR vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.87 | 1.58 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.46 | 4.02 | +6.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 57.55 | 21.50 | +36.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.59 | 2.80 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 1.04 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.49 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
BAPR vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAPR drawdown since its inception was -23.91%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAPR and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.91% | -46.23% | +22.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.93% | -3.58% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -10.24% | -5.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.58% | -10.24% | -5.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.27% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -6.18% | +3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.67% | -0.32% |
Volatility
BAPR vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (BAPR) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) have volatilities of 1.06% and 1.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAPR | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.06% | 1.02% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.53% | 3.83% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.64% | 5.15% | +0.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.49% | 8.41% | +3.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 17.67% | -4.55% |
BAPR vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAPR vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
Neither BAPR nor BUFF has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BAPR and BUFF have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BAPR has higher volatility (1.06%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAPR dropped -23.91% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BAPR leads with 11.17% vs 8.71% for BUFF. On fees, BAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BAPR has performed better with a 11.17% return vs 8.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
BAPR and BUFF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
BAPR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index April, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BAPR and 0.89% for BUFF.
BAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAPR and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer