BAND vs. MATIC-USD

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BAND (Bandwidth Inc.) is a stock, while MATIC-USD (Polygon USD) is a cryptocurrency. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BAND vs. MATIC-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) and Polygon USD (MATIC-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BAND

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -14.84%
• YTD: 238.38%
• 6M: 247.14%
• 1Y: 258.08%
• 3Y*: 60.44%
• 5Y*: -17.74%
• 10Y*: —

MATIC-USD

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAND vs. MATIC-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BAND Bandwidth Inc.	238.38%	-9.22%	17.62%	-36.95%	-68.02%	-53.30%	139.92%	-14.38%
MATIC-USD Polygon USD	0.00%	-29.46%	-53.57%	28.05%	-69.98%	14,215.20%	27.71%	205.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BAND and MATIC-USD is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2019	0.10

Return for Risk

BAND vs. MATIC-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAND

BAND Risk / Return Rank: 96
BAND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
BAND Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
BAND Omega Ratio Rank: 96
BAND Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
BAND Martin Ratio Rank: 95

MATIC-USD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAND vs. MATIC-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) and Polygon USD (MATIC-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BAND	MATIC-USD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.50	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.91	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	BAND	MATIC-USD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.82%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-93.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-72.92%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.98%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BAND	MATIC-USD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.27%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	66.67%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	82.40%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	78.71%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	67.52%	—	—

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAND and MATIC-USD in my portfolio?

BAND and MATIC-USD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.