PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MATIC-USD vs. DOT-USD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MATIC-USD and DOT-USD is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

MATIC-USD vs. DOT-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polygon USD (MATIC-USD) and Polkadot (DOT-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%0.00%50.00%100.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-20.25%
7.02%
MATIC-USD
DOT-USD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MATIC-USD:

-0.69

DOT-USD:

-0.36

Sortino Ratio

MATIC-USD:

-0.90

DOT-USD:

-0.01

Omega Ratio

MATIC-USD:

0.92

DOT-USD:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

MATIC-USD:

0.01

DOT-USD:

0.00

Martin Ratio

MATIC-USD:

-1.54

DOT-USD:

-0.93

Ulcer Index

MATIC-USD:

37.78%

DOT-USD:

33.48%

Daily Std Dev

MATIC-USD:

69.90%

DOT-USD:

69.96%

Max Drawdown

MATIC-USD:

-89.89%

DOT-USD:

-93.24%

Current Drawdown

MATIC-USD:

-86.29%

DOT-USD:

-89.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MATIC-USD achieves a -12.22% return, which is significantly higher than DOT-USD's -13.13% return.


MATIC-USD

YTD

-12.22%

1M

-14.06%

6M

-20.25%

1Y

-50.56%

5Y*

85.62%

10Y*

N/A

DOT-USD

YTD

-13.13%

1M

-13.93%

6M

7.02%

1Y

-15.76%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MATIC-USD vs. DOT-USD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MATIC-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MATIC-USD is 1313
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MATIC-USD is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DOT-USD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DOT-USD is 4141
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DOT-USD is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MATIC-USD vs. DOT-USD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polygon USD (MATIC-USD) and Polkadot (DOT-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MATIC-USD, currently valued at -0.69, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.69-0.36
The chart of Sortino ratio for MATIC-USD, currently valued at -0.90, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.90-0.01
The chart of Omega ratio for MATIC-USD, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market1.001.201.401.600.921.00
The chart of Calmar ratio for MATIC-USD, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market2.004.006.000.010.00
The chart of Martin ratio for MATIC-USD, currently valued at -1.54, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00-1.54-0.93
MATIC-USD
DOT-USD

The current MATIC-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the DOT-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATIC-USD and DOT-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-0.69
-0.36
MATIC-USD
DOT-USD

Drawdowns

MATIC-USD vs. DOT-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MATIC-USD drawdown since its inception was -89.89%, roughly equal to the maximum DOT-USD drawdown of -93.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATIC-USD and DOT-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-90.00%-85.00%-80.00%-75.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-86.29%
-89.31%
MATIC-USD
DOT-USD

Volatility

MATIC-USD vs. DOT-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Polygon USD (MATIC-USD) is 22.95%, while Polkadot (DOT-USD) has a volatility of 25.05%. This indicates that MATIC-USD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOT-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%45.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
22.95%
25.05%
MATIC-USD
DOT-USD
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab