MATIC-USD vs. DOT-USD

In the year-to-date period, MATIC-USD achieves a -51.97% return, which is significantly lower than DOT-USD's -37.07% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polygon USD (MATIC-USD) and Polkadot (DOT-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current MATIC-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.83, which is lower than the DOT-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MATIC-USD and DOT-USD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

The maximum MATIC-USD drawdown since its inception was -92.85%, roughly equal to the maximum DOT-USD drawdown of -93.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MATIC-USD and DOT-USD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Polygon USD (MATIC-USD) and Polkadot (DOT-USD) have volatilities of 23.98% and 22.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.