PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Banco Bpm SpA (BAMI.MI) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

BAMI.MI is traded in EUR, while AUCO.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AUCO.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAMI.MI achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than AUCO.L's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, BAMI.MI has outperformed AUCO.L with an annualized return of 21.89%, while AUCO.L has yielded a comparatively lower 14.06% annualized return.


BAMI.MI

1D
2.78%
1M
6.37%
YTD
9.53%
6M
16.61%
1Y
43.34%
3Y*
68.81%
5Y*
46.73%
10Y*
21.89%

AUCO.L

1D
-1.55%
1M
-14.32%
YTD
-6.87%
6M
-1.00%
1Y
52.31%
3Y*
42.90%
5Y*
22.03%
10Y*
14.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAMI.MI
Banco Bpm SpA
9.53%83.87%89.87%51.78%34.49%49.63%-10.84%3.05%-24.81%14.41%
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-6.87%148.38%25.74%11.57%-8.99%-3.40%11.69%47.39%-6.21%-3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between BAMI.MI and AUCO.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2008

0.01

The correlation between BAMI.MI and AUCO.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (10 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMI.MI
BAMI.MI Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BAMI.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMI.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMI.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMI.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMI.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AUCO.L
AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Banco Bpm SpA (BAMI.MI) and L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMI.MIAUCO.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.21

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

1.73

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

4.53

+4.16

BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAMI.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAMI.MI and AUCO.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMI.MIAUCO.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

1.18

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.37

0.61

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.42

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.05

0.24

-0.29

Drawdowns

BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMI.MI drawdown since its inception was -97.29%, which is greater than AUCO.L's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMI.MI and AUCO.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMI.MIAUCO.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.29%

-73.63%

-23.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-30.09%

+15.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-30.09%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.09%

-41.98%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-70.37%

-47.20%

-23.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.99%

-30.09%

-14.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.87%

-33.83%

-46.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.91%

11.52%

-6.61%

Volatility

BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Banco Bpm SpA (BAMI.MI) is 5.69%, while L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) has a volatility of 14.37%. This indicates that BAMI.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AUCO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMI.MIAUCO.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.69%

14.37%

-8.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.90%

35.45%

-15.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.15%

44.32%

-17.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.88%

36.08%

-2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.19%

33.72%

+7.47%

Dividends

BAMI.MI vs. AUCO.L - Dividend Comparison

BAMI.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, while AUCO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BAMI.MI
Banco Bpm SpA
7.30%8.14%12.29%4.81%5.71%2.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAMI.MI and AUCO.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAMI.MI and AUCO.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer