BAMBX vs. TMSRX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX).
BAMBX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA 3 Month Treasury Bill Index (G0O1) (USD). It was launched on Sep 29, 2020. TMSRX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 22, 2018.
Performance
BAMBX vs. TMSRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAMBX vs. TMSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund | 0.97% | 4.59% | 6.61% | 6.19% | -3.23% | 5.84% | 3.34% | 8.25% | 1.81% |
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund | 0.41% | 2.95% | 5.36% | 5.09% | -4.69% | -2.08% | 13.21% | 7.59% | -4.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAMBX achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than TMSRX's 0.41% return.
BAMBX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -3.15%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- 1Y
- 2.75%
- 3Y*
- 6.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 4.43%
TMSRX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAMBX vs. TMSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAMBX has a 1.20% expense ratio, which is higher than TMSRX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAMBX vs. TMSRX — Risk / Return Rank
BAMBX
TMSRX
BAMBX vs. TMSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) and T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAMBX | TMSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | 1.41 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.85 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.50 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 5.92 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAMBX | TMSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.41 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.42 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.84 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAMBX and TMSRX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
BAMBX vs. TMSRX - Dividend Comparison
BAMBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than TMSRX's 9.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMBX BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund | 1.95% | 1.97% | 3.86% | 4.13% | 4.70% | 2.39% | 1.09% | 3.73% | 8.70% | 3.81% | 4.82% |
TMSRX T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund | 9.49% | 7.59% | 6.72% | 5.95% | 2.29% | 2.88% | 3.35% | 3.00% | 3.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAMBX vs. TMSRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAMBX drawdown since its inception was -8.84%, smaller than the maximum TMSRX drawdown of -10.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMBX and TMSRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAMBX | TMSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -10.67% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.61% | -1.84% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.66% | -10.59% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -8.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -0.16% | -2.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.21% | -2.79% | +1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 0.50% | +0.51% |
Volatility
BAMBX vs. TMSRX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Systematic Multi-Strategy Fund (BAMBX) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to T. Rowe Price Multi-Strategy Total Return Fund (TMSRX) at 0.00%. This indicates that BAMBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAMBX | TMSRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.49% | 0.00% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.83% | 1.44% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 2.10% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.56% | 2.79% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.54% | 3.31% | +0.23% |