PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAMA vs. DWAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BAMA vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BAMA vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
BAMA
Brookstone Active ETF
-4.10%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical ETF
0.00%

Returns By Period


BAMA

1D
2.22%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
-2.54%
6M
-0.48%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DWAT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAMA vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAMA has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.66% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BAMA vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAMA
BAMA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BAMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BAMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAMA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DWAT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAMA vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAMADWATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.89

BAMA vs. DWAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAMADWATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

Dividends

BAMA vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison

BAMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
BAMA
Brookstone Active ETF
1.58%1.54%1.49%0.45%
DWAT
Arrow DWA Tactical ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BAMA vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAMA drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMA and DWAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMADWATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.27%

0.00%

-12.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.30%

0.00%

-5.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.29%

0.00%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

Volatility

BAMA vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BAMADWATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

0.00%

+12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.15%

0.00%

+10.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.15%

0.00%

+10.15%