BAMA vs. DWAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT).
BAMA and DWAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BAMA is an actively managed fund by Brookstone. It was launched on Sep 27, 2023. DWAT is an actively managed fund by Arrow Funds. It was launched on Oct 1, 2014.
Performance
BAMA vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAMA vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF | -4.10% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical ETF | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
BAMA
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- -2.54%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 12.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAMA vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAMA has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAMA vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
BAMA
DWAT
BAMA vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookstone Active ETF (BAMA) and Arrow DWA Tactical ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAMA | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAMA | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | — | — |
Dividends
BAMA vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
BAMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BAMA Brookstone Active ETF | 1.58% | 1.54% | 1.49% | 0.45% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAMA vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAMA drawdown since its inception was -12.27%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAMA and DWAT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAMA | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | 0.00% | -12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.30% | 0.00% | -5.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.29% | 0.00% | -1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | — | — |
Volatility
BAMA vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAMA | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 0.00% | +12.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 0.00% | +10.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 0.00% | +10.15% |