PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAM.TO achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than MDA.TO's 95.80% return.


BAM.TO

1D
1.48%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
-9.11%
1Y
-7.86%
3Y*
18.57%
5Y*
10Y*

MDA.TO

1D
-8.57%
1M
-3.03%
YTD
95.80%
6M
106.00%
1Y
76.45%
3Y*
83.01%
5Y*
28.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BAM.TO
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
-6.38%-4.85%51.69%42.64%33.69%
MDA.TO
MDA Space Ltd.
95.80%-9.79%156.34%80.00%-1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BAM.TO and MDA.TO is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2022

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BAM.TO:

CA$107.08B

MDA.TO:

CA$6.92B

EPS

BAM.TO:

$1.54

MDA.TO:

CA$0.81

PE Ratio

BAM.TO:

30.56

MDA.TO:

64.10

PEG Ratio

BAM.TO:

0.05

MDA.TO:

0.26

PS Ratio

BAM.TO:

15.53

MDA.TO:

3.86

PB Ratio

BAM.TO:

8.91

MDA.TO:

3.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

BAM.TO:

$4.94B

MDA.TO:

CA$1.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BAM.TO:

$3.48B

MDA.TO:

CA$366.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

BAM.TO:

$3.14B

MDA.TO:

CA$291.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAM.TO
BAM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
BAM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

MDA.TO
MDA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MDA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) and MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAM.TOMDA.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.24

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

1.43

-1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.64

3.07

-3.71

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAM.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the MDA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAM.TO and MDA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAM.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.80%, smaller than the maximum MDA.TO drawdown of -68.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAM.TO and MDA.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAM.TOMDA.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.80%

-68.33%

+37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.31%

-53.77%

+23.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.80%

-53.77%

+22.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.54%

-22.30%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.24%

-30.65%

+21.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.31%

25.08%

-8.77%

Volatility

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brookfield Asset Management Ltd (BAM.TO) is 9.78%, while MDA Space Ltd. (MDA.TO) has a volatility of 21.96%. This indicates that BAM.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAM.TOMDA.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.78%

21.96%

-12.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.05%

45.64%

-23.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.95%

65.12%

-36.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.28%

49.43%

-8.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.28%

49.45%

-8.17%

Dividends

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Dividend Comparison

BAM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, while MDA.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAM.TO
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
3.93%3.40%2.67%3.27%
MDA.TO
MDA Space Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brookfield Asset Management Ltd and MDA Space Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
1.32B
464.10M
(BAM.TO) Total Revenue
(MDA.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. BAM.TO values in USD, MDA.TO values in CAD

BAM.TO vs. MDA.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brookfield Asset Management Ltd and MDA Space Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
80.7%
18.1%
Portfolio components
BAM.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 1.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.7%.

MDA.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported a gross profit of 84.00M and revenue of 464.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.1%.

BAM.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported an operating income of 595.08M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 45.2%.

MDA.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported an operating income of 32.30M and revenue of 464.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

BAM.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brookfield Asset Management Ltd reported a net income of 606.89M and revenue of 1.32B, resulting in a net margin of 46.1%.

MDA.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MDA Space Ltd. reported a net income of 29.60M and revenue of 464.10M, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAM.TO and MDA.TO have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAM.TO and MDA.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer