PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALQ vs. QXQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BALQ vs. QXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF (BALQ) and SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BALQ achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than QXQ's 16.17% return.


BALQ

1D
-3.11%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
18.59%
6M
17.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QXQ

1D
-2.94%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
16.17%
6M
15.07%
1Y
36.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BALQ vs. QXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BALQ and QXQ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025

0.99

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BALQ vs. QXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QXQ
QXQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALQ vs. QXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF (BALQ) and SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF (QXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BALQQXQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

BALQ vs. QXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BALQ vs. QXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALQ drawdown since its inception was -11.79%, smaller than the maximum QXQ drawdown of -22.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALQ and QXQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BALQQXQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.79%

-22.53%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-4.17%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-3.61%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

Volatility

BALQ vs. QXQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BALQQXQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.62%

17.73%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

22.15%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

22.15%

-1.53%

BALQ vs. QXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QXQ's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

BALQ vs. QXQ - Dividend Comparison

BALQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, less than QXQ's 15.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BALQ
iShares Nasdaq Premium Income Active ETF
4.76%0.95%0.00%
QXQ
SGI Enhanced Nasdaq-100 ETF
15.41%18.21%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BALQ and QXQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BALQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BALQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for QXQ.

QXQ has the higher dividend yield at 15.41%, compared with 4.76% for BALQ.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Summit Global Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BALQ and 0.98% for QXQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BALQ and QXQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer