BALL vs. BLCR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BALL (Ball Corporation) is a stock, while BLCR (Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Over the past year, BALL returned 0.43% vs 45.16% for BLCR. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

BALL vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ball Corporation (BALL) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BALL achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's 18.88% return.

BALL

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: -7.38%
• YTD: 0.15%
• 6M: 8.60%
• 1Y: 0.43%
• 3Y*: 0.50%
• 5Y*: -7.38%
• 10Y*: 4.68%

BLCR

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 3.96%
• YTD: 18.88%
• 6M: 20.88%
• 1Y: 45.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BALL vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BALL Ball Corporation	0.15%	-2.43%	-2.96%	22.83%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	18.88%	30.93%	17.07%	14.18%

Correlation

The correlation between BALL and BLCR is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023	0.27

The correlation between BALL and BLCR shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

BALL vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALL

BALL Risk / Return Rank: 39
BALL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
BALL Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
BALL Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BALL Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BALL Martin Ratio Rank: 42

BLCR

BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 86
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 84
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALL vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ball Corporation (BALL) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BALL	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	2.92	-2.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.22	3.88	-3.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.50	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.02	4.42	-4.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.04	20.96	-20.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BALL vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALL Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALL and BLCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BALL	BLCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02	2.92	-2.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	1.88	-1.48

Drawdowns

BALL vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALL drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, which is greater than BLCR's maximum drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALL and BLCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BALL	BLCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.09%	-21.29%	-33.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.96%	-10.26%	-11.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.09%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.58%	-0.94%	-41.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.48%	-2.19%	-14.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.36%	2.16%	+10.20%

Volatility

BALL vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

Ball Corporation (BALL) has a higher volatility of 7.04% compared to Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) at 4.33%. This indicates that BALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BALL	BLCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.04%	4.33%	+2.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.72%	12.26%	+7.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.84%	15.55%	+10.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.39%	17.46%	+12.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.31%	17.46%	+10.85%

Dividends

BALL vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

BALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than BLCR's 0.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BALL Ball Corporation	1.52%	1.51%	1.45%	1.39%	1.56%	0.73%	0.64%	0.85%	0.87%	0.96%	0.69%	0.71%
BLCR Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF	0.23%	0.33%	0.75%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BALL and BLCR in my portfolio?

BALL and BLCR have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BALL or BLCR?

BALL has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to BLCR (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALL dropped -55.09% vs BLCR's -21.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.