PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALFX vs. FCSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BALFX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund (BALFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BALFX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than FCSRX's 7.94% return. Over the past 10 years, BALFX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 10.05%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.


BALFX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.67%
6M
10.59%
1Y
25.12%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
9.57%
10Y*
10.05%

FCSRX

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
7.94%
6M
8.60%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
8.94%
5Y*
5.13%
10Y*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BALFX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BALFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund
9.67%18.40%14.91%13.62%-12.19%15.69%10.81%18.50%-3.54%14.63%
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
7.94%9.27%4.75%3.60%-4.26%14.68%2.60%9.54%-5.03%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between BALFX and FCSRX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2005

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between BALFX and FCSRX has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BALFX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALFX
BALFX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BALFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BALFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FCSRX
FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALFX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund (BALFX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BALFXFCSRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.95

3.43

-0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.12

4.84

-0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.68

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

7.80

-4.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.54

29.66

-13.12

BALFX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is comparable to the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALFX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BALFXFCSRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

3.43

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.75

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

0.70

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.44

+0.24

Drawdowns

BALFX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALFX drawdown since its inception was -40.20%, which is greater than FCSRX's maximum drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALFX and FCSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BALFXFCSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.20%

-33.91%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.03%

-1.99%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.67%

-5.85%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-13.22%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.34%

-20.02%

-2.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.06%

+1.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.10%

+0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

0.52%

+1.03%

Volatility

BALFX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds American Balanced Fund (BALFX) has a higher volatility of 2.66% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.19%. This indicates that BALFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BALFXFCSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

1.19%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

3.57%

+3.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

4.59%

+4.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

6.89%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.66%

6.71%

+3.95%

BALFX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALFX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BALFX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

BALFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, more than FCSRX's 3.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BALFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund
7.51%8.22%7.14%2.02%2.24%4.24%4.31%3.44%5.30%4.66%4.18%5.54%
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
3.28%3.74%3.86%4.35%6.51%4.53%1.32%2.20%8.51%1.58%1.34%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


BALFX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BALFX has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to FCSRX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALFX dropped -40.20% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.43 vs 2.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BALFX and FCSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer