PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BALCX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BALCX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C (BALCX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BALCX having a 9.64% return and FRGAX slightly lower at 9.37%.


BALCX

1D
0.25%
1M
3.91%
YTD
9.64%
6M
10.20%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
9.35%

FRGAX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.20%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.79%
1Y
22.55%
3Y*
16.33%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BALCX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BALCX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C
9.64%17.58%14.00%12.97%-1.31%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
9.37%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between BALCX and FRGAX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2022

0.95

The correlation between BALCX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BALCX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BALCX
BALCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
BALCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BALCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BALCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
BALCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
BALCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BALCX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C (BALCX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BALCXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.48

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

3.27

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.67

14.61

+1.06

BALCX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BALCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BALCX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BALCXFRGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

2.55

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

1.54

-0.92

Drawdowns

BALCX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BALCX drawdown since its inception was -40.88%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALCX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BALCXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.88%

-11.77%

-29.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.08%

-7.03%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.77%

-11.77%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.46%

-1.58%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

1.57%

0.00%

Volatility

BALCX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C (BALCX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) have volatilities of 2.66% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BALCXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.66%

2.75%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

7.19%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

9.03%

-0.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

10.31%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

10.31%

+0.36%

BALCX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BALCX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BALCX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

BALCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than FRGAX's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BALCX
American Funds American Balanced Fund Class C
6.93%7.61%6.37%1.54%1.53%3.60%3.68%2.79%4.67%4.17%3.51%4.81%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.83%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, BALCX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to BALCX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALCX dropped -40.88% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

BALCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BALCX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer