PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAIG vs. NBIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAIG vs. NBIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BBAI Daily ETF (BAIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAIG achieves a -47.34% return, which is significantly lower than NBIG's 487.61% return.


BAIG

1D
-4.26%
1M
22.11%
YTD
-47.34%
6M
-70.71%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBIG

1D
6.23%
1M
96.57%
YTD
487.61%
6M
268.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAIG vs. NBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BAIG and NBIG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAIG vs. NBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BBAI Daily ETF (BAIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NBIS Daily ETF (NBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BAIG vs. NBIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAIGNBIGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

1.38

-1.80

Drawdowns

BAIG vs. NBIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAIG drawdown since its inception was -92.86%, which is greater than NBIG's maximum drawdown of -75.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIG and NBIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAIGNBIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.86%

-75.83%

-17.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-85.26%

-3.94%

-81.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.01%

-42.82%

-20.19%

Volatility

BAIG vs. NBIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAIGNBIGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

180.08%

200.64%

-20.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

180.08%

200.64%

-20.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

180.08%

200.64%

-20.56%

BAIG vs. NBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAIG has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than NBIG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAIG vs. NBIG - Dividend Comparison

BAIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.38%, while NBIG has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAIG and NBIG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NBIG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NBIG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for BAIG.

BAIG has the higher dividend yield at 10.38%, compared with 0.00% for NBIG.

Their fees differ too: 0.78% for BAIG and 0.75% for NBIG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAIG and NBIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer