PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAIG vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAIG vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long BBAI Daily ETF (BAIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAIG achieves a -72.36% return, which is significantly lower than AMDG's 325.97% return.


BAIG

1D
-12.73%
1M
-34.72%
YTD
-72.36%
6M
-78.08%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDG

1D
-0.73%
1M
15.00%
YTD
325.97%
6M
321.83%
1Y
709.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAIG vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BAIG and AMDG is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAIG vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAIG vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long BBAI Daily ETF (BAIG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAIGAMDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.57

BAIG vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAIG vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAIG drawdown since its inception was -92.86%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAIG and AMDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAIGAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.86%

-63.32%

-29.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.26%

-13.25%

-79.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-64.43%

-25.36%

-39.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.07%

Volatility

BAIG vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAIGAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

102.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

177.86%

134.56%

+43.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

177.86%

132.26%

+45.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

177.86%

132.26%

+45.60%

BAIG vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAIG has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAIG vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

BAIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.77%, more than AMDG's 2.63% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


BAIG and AMDG have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for BAIG.

BAIG has the higher dividend yield at 19.77%, compared with 2.63% for AMDG.

Their fees differ too: 0.78% for BAIG and 0.75% for AMDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAIG and AMDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer