PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAGY vs. TBIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAGY vs. TBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGY achieves a -22.48% return, which is significantly lower than TBIL's 1.67% return.


BAGY

1D
2.77%
1M
-15.35%
YTD
-22.48%
6M
-23.01%
1Y
-36.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TBIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.67%
6M
1.76%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAGY vs. TBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BAGY and TBIL is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAGY vs. TBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGY
BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

TBIL
TBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
TBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
TBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAGY vs. TBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAGYTBILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-59.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

17.08

-16.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

195.79

-196.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.30

929.44

-930.74

BAGY vs. TBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is lower than the TBIL Sharpe Ratio of 13.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGY and TBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAGY vs. TBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGY drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than TBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGY and TBIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAGYTBILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-0.10%

-49.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.84%

-0.02%

-49.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.46%

0.00%

-45.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-0.00%

-20.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.18%

0.00%

+28.18%

Volatility

BAGY vs. TBIL - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a higher volatility of 13.82% compared to F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF (TBIL) at 0.06%. This indicates that BAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAGYTBILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.82%

0.06%

+13.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.82%

0.19%

+33.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.85%

0.29%

+42.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.24%

0.32%

+40.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.24%

0.32%

+40.92%

BAGY vs. TBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAGY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TBIL's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAGY vs. TBIL - Dividend Comparison

BAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.68%, more than TBIL's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BAGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF
58.68%30.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TBIL
F/m US Treasury 3 Month Bill ETF
3.81%4.07%5.02%5.00%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAGY and TBIL have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAGY has higher volatility (13.82%) compared to TBIL (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGY dropped -49.84% vs TBIL's -0.10%.

On 1-year performance, TBIL leads with 3.91% vs -36.45% for BAGY. On fees, TBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TBIL has performed better with a 3.91% return vs -36.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BAGY.

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 58.68%, compared with 3.81% for TBIL.

BAGY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TBIL is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BAGY and 0.15% for TBIL.

TBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (13.76 vs -0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAGY and TBIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer