PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAGY vs. PAPI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAGY vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGY achieves a -25.28% return, which is significantly lower than PAPI's 6.57% return.


BAGY

1D
-3.61%
1M
-18.40%
YTD
-25.28%
6M
-25.26%
1Y
-38.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PAPI

1D
0.45%
1M
0.17%
YTD
6.57%
6M
5.93%
1Y
12.01%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAGY vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BAGY and PAPI is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAGY vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGY
BAGY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BAGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PAPI
PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAGY vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAGYPAPIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.20

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

1.76

-2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.37

4.42

-5.79

BAGY vs. PAPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the PAPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGY and PAPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BAGY vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGY drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than PAPI's maximum drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGY and PAPI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAGYPAPIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-14.27%

-35.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.84%

-6.86%

-42.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.43%

-4.37%

-43.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.76%

-2.77%

-17.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.33%

2.72%

+25.61%

Volatility

BAGY vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF (BAGY) has a higher volatility of 14.04% compared to Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) at 2.68%. This indicates that BAGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAGYPAPIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.04%

2.68%

+11.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.99%

7.05%

+26.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.91%

10.55%

+32.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.30%

11.73%

+29.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.30%

11.73%

+29.57%

BAGY vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAGY has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAGY vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison

BAGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.88%, more than PAPI's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BAGY
Amplify Bitcoin Max Income Covered Call ETF
60.88%30.16%0.00%0.00%
PAPI
Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF
7.56%7.59%7.07%1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAGY and PAPI have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAGY has higher volatility (14.04%) compared to PAPI (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGY dropped -49.84% vs PAPI's -14.27%.

On 1-year performance, PAPI leads with 12.01% vs -38.64% for BAGY. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PAPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PAPI has performed better with a 12.01% return vs -38.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BAGY.

BAGY has the higher dividend yield at 60.88%, compared with 7.56% for PAPI.

They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BAGY and 0.29% for PAPI.

PAPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAGY and PAPI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer