PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAGPX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAGPX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares (BAGPX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAGPX achieves a 9.49% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 21.03% return. Over the past 10 years, BAGPX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 8.08%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.54% annualized return.


BAGPX

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.72%
YTD
9.49%
6M
9.79%
1Y
21.29%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
8.08%

NASDX

1D
-0.29%
1M
9.16%
YTD
21.03%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
32.52%
5Y*
19.94%
10Y*
22.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAGPX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAGPX
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares
9.49%15.67%2.29%15.54%-16.08%7.33%20.85%20.62%-6.19%14.35%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.03%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BAGPX and NASDX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2006

0.85

The correlation between BAGPX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAGPX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAGPX
BAGPX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BAGPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAGPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAGPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BAGPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAGPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAGPX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares (BAGPX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAGPXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.52

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

13.66

-0.13

BAGPX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGPX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAGPXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.60

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.87

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

1.00

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.33

+0.14

Drawdowns

BAGPX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGPX drawdown since its inception was -47.25%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGPX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAGPXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.25%

-83.16%

+35.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-11.90%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.99%

-22.71%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.07%

-35.33%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.37%

-35.33%

+12.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.29%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.49%

-34.37%

+27.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

3.06%

-1.44%

Volatility

BAGPX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares (BAGPX) is 3.24%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that BAGPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAGPXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

4.52%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.69%

12.19%

-4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.09%

16.10%

-7.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.87%

23.05%

-11.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.29%

22.68%

-11.39%

BAGPX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAGPX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAGPX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

BAGPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.15%, more than NASDX's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAGPX
BlackRock 60/40 Target Allocation Fund Investor A Shares
7.15%7.83%0.00%2.75%2.28%7.40%3.54%3.50%7.13%2.91%1.55%9.78%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.99%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAGPX and NASDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NASDX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to BAGPX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGPX dropped -47.25% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAGPX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer