BAFWX vs. BIAHX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX).
BAFWX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Jun 29, 2012. BIAHX is managed by Brown Advisory Funds. It was launched on Oct 20, 2013.
Performance
BAFWX vs. BIAHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BAFWX vs. BIAHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAFWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares | -12.45% | 3.35% | 20.35% | 39.07% | -30.90% | 30.01% | 39.09% | 36.09% | 4.51% | 28.10% |
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund | -2.69% | 47.26% | 10.85% | 19.36% | -11.95% | 14.54% | 11.34% | 29.43% | -16.60% | 32.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAFWX achieves a -12.45% return, which is significantly lower than BIAHX's -2.69% return. Over the past 10 years, BAFWX has outperformed BIAHX with an annualized return of 13.77%, while BIAHX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.69% annualized return.
BAFWX
- 1D
- 3.28%
- 1M
- -4.61%
- YTD
- -12.45%
- 6M
- -15.24%
- 1Y
- -0.19%
- 3Y*
- 9.80%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.77%
BIAHX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 23.54%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 12.97%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BAFWX vs. BIAHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAFWX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAHX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BAFWX vs. BIAHX — Risk / Return Rank
BAFWX
BIAHX
BAFWX vs. BIAHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BAFWX | BIAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 1.58 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.20 | 2.09 | -1.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.31 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 1.74 | -1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 6.91 | -6.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BAFWX | BIAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.58 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.81 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.68 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.57 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between BAFWX and BIAHX is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BAFWX vs. BIAHX - Dividend Comparison
BAFWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.22%, more than BIAHX's 7.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAFWX Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares | 27.22% | 23.83% | 5.23% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 1.82% | 0.00% | 1.48% | 3.71% | 1.70% | 0.71% | 4.73% |
BIAHX Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund | 7.81% | 7.60% | 5.16% | 1.13% | 2.66% | 9.72% | 6.39% | 9.78% | 12.12% | 0.83% | 1.19% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BAFWX vs. BIAHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAFWX drawdown since its inception was -36.86%, which is greater than BIAHX's maximum drawdown of -34.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFWX and BIAHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAFWX | BIAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.86% | -34.90% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.93% | -13.18% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.86% | -30.95% | -5.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.86% | -34.90% | -1.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.22% | -10.18% | -7.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.69% | -6.02% | +0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.96% | 3.31% | +3.65% |
Volatility
BAFWX vs. BIAHX - Volatility Comparison
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Brown Advisory - WMC Strategic European Equity Fund (BIAHX) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BAFWX | BIAHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 6.71% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 9.78% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 15.19% | +7.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.60% | 16.17% | +6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.44% | 17.19% | +4.25% |