PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAFWX vs. BIAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAFWX vs. BIAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAFWX achieves a 7.08% return, which is significantly higher than BIAFX's 5.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BAFWX having a 15.79% annualized return and BIAFX not far behind at 15.37%.


BAFWX

1D
-0.16%
1M
9.41%
YTD
7.08%
6M
6.03%
1Y
10.33%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
9.85%
10Y*
15.79%

BIAFX

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.23%
YTD
5.43%
6M
6.43%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
15.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFWX vs. BIAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
7.08%3.35%20.35%39.07%-30.90%30.01%39.09%36.09%4.51%28.10%
BIAFX
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund
5.43%9.74%23.72%34.52%-21.07%24.95%19.89%42.29%-4.15%24.12%

Correlation

The correlation between BAFWX and BIAFX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.88

The correlation between BAFWX and BIAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAFWX vs. BIAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFWX
BAFWX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
BAFWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BAFWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
BAFWX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
BAFWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BAFWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BIAFX
BIAFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
BIAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
BIAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFWX vs. BIAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) and Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAFWXBIAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.20

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

1.08

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.41

3.90

-2.49

BAFWX vs. BIAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAFWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the BIAFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAFWX and BIAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAFWXBIAFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

1.09

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.59

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.80

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.50

+0.30

Drawdowns

BAFWX vs. BIAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAFWX drawdown since its inception was -36.86%, smaller than the maximum BIAFX drawdown of -60.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFWX and BIAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAFWXBIAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.86%

-60.32%

+23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.93%

-13.10%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.03%

-17.99%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.86%

-27.44%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.86%

-35.49%

-1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.13%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-10.15%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.64%

3.63%

+4.01%

Volatility

BAFWX vs. BIAFX - Volatility Comparison

Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares (BAFWX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund (BIAFX) at 2.68%. This indicates that BAFWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAFWXBIAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.68%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

10.04%

+3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

13.08%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.62%

17.83%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.51%

19.18%

+2.33%

BAFWX vs. BIAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFWX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than BIAFX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAFWX vs. BIAFX - Dividend Comparison

BAFWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.26%, more than BIAFX's 5.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BAFWX
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Fund Institutional Shares
22.26%23.83%5.23%0.01%0.00%1.82%0.00%1.48%3.71%1.70%0.71%4.73%
BIAFX
Brown Advisory Flexible Equity Fund
5.51%5.81%4.81%2.67%3.71%3.75%3.16%8.65%4.15%0.42%0.44%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAFWX and BIAFX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BAFWX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to BIAFX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAFWX dropped -36.86% vs BIAFX's -60.32%.

BIAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAFWX and BIAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer