PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BAFMX vs. LSHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BAFMX vs. LSHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund (BAFMX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BAFMX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LSHAX

1D
0.86%
1M
-10.88%
YTD
26.72%
6M
19.50%
1Y
0.59%
3Y*
26.86%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
17.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFMX vs. LSHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BAFMX
Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund
-2.65%3.70%15.29%23.21%-28.12%6.32%32.56%38.63%-8.59%
LSHAX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund
26.72%-19.53%82.16%-19.74%39.45%42.75%5.23%31.30%-9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BAFMX and LSHAX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2018

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between BAFMX and LSHAX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BAFMX vs. LSHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFMX

LSHAX
LSHAX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
LSHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
LSHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFMX vs. LSHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund (BAFMX) and Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund (LSHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BAFMX vs. LSHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BAFMXLSHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

Drawdowns

BAFMX vs. LSHAX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAFMXLSHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.18%

Volatility

BAFMX vs. LSHAX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAFMXLSHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.66%

BAFMX vs. LSHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFMX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than LSHAX's 1.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BAFMX vs. LSHAX - Dividend Comparison

BAFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 75.00%, more than LSHAX's 9.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BAFMX
Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Fund
75.00%73.01%0.00%0.00%6.85%9.92%0.00%0.52%1.14%0.00%0.00%
LSHAX
Kinetics Spin-Off and Corporate Restructuring Fund
9.15%11.59%4.66%9.40%1.76%0.11%0.53%0.00%4.85%3.94%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


BAFMX and LSHAX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BAFMX and LSHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer