BAFE vs. NRSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BAFE (Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. BAFE is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, BAFE returned 13.86% vs 58.80% for NRSH. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BAFE charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.

Performance

BAFE vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BAFE achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.92% return.

BAFE

• 1D: -0.35%
• 1M: 1.97%
• YTD: 5.14%
• 6M: 6.05%
• 1Y: 13.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRSH

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 13.93%
• YTD: 47.92%
• 6M: 46.01%
• 1Y: 58.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BAFE vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BAFE Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF	5.14%	9.80%	-0.51%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	47.92%	12.95%	-10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between BAFE and NRSH is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024	0.65

The correlation between BAFE and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BAFE vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BAFE

BAFE Risk / Return Rank: 28
BAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
BAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
BAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 30
BAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
BAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

NRSH

NRSH Risk / Return Rank: 76
NRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
NRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
NRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BAFE vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BAFE	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	2.42	-1.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	3.11	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.40	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	5.40	-4.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.91	16.86	-12.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BAFE vs. NRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAFE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the NRSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAFE and NRSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BAFE	NRSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.08	2.42	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	1.11	-0.56

Drawdowns

BAFE vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAFE drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAFE and NRSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	BAFE	NRSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.37%	-24.01%	+5.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.73%	-10.94%	-1.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.45%	0.00%	-0.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-5.62%	+2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	3.50%	+0.05%

Volatility

BAFE vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF (BAFE) is 2.62%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.21%. This indicates that BAFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BAFE	NRSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.62%	9.21%	-6.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.80%	20.27%	-10.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.94%	24.44%	-11.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	21.54%	-4.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.45%	21.54%	-4.09%

BAFE vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

BAFE has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BAFE vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison

BAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, which matches NRSH's 0.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BAFE Brown Advisory Flexible Equity ETF	0.28%	0.30%	0.06%	0.00%
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF	0.28%	0.42%	0.90%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BAFE and NRSH in my portfolio?

BAFE and NRSH have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BAFE or NRSH?

NRSH has higher volatility (9.21%) compared to BAFE (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAFE dropped -18.37% vs NRSH's -24.01%.

Which ETF is better, BAFE or NRSH?

On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 58.80% vs 13.86% for BAFE. On fees, BAFE is cheaper at 0.54% per year. On volatility, BAFE has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BAFE or NRSH?

Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 58.80% return vs 13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BAFE or NRSH?

BAFE is cheaper with a 0.54% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BAFE or NRSH?

BAFE and NRSH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.28%.

What is the main difference between BAFE and NRSH?

They also come from different issuers: Brown Advisory and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.54% for BAFE and 0.75% for NRSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.