PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BACIX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BACIX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACIX achieves a 29.12% return, which is significantly higher than NASDX's 21.38% return. Over the past 10 years, BACIX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 9.06%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.58% annualized return.


BACIX

1D
1.36%
1M
-2.77%
YTD
29.12%
6M
27.86%
1Y
41.98%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
18.93%
10Y*
9.06%

NASDX

1D
0.47%
1M
10.94%
YTD
21.38%
6M
19.90%
1Y
42.08%
3Y*
32.65%
5Y*
20.44%
10Y*
22.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BACIX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BACIX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
29.12%11.03%4.23%2.97%43.64%43.50%-29.38%13.04%-19.55%2.47%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
21.38%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between BACIX and NASDX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2005

0.45

The correlation between BACIX and NASDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BACIX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BACIX
BACIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
BACIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BACIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
BACIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BACIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BACIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BACIX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BACIXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.46

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.80

3.65

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.31

14.16

+0.15

BACIX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACIX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BACIXNASDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.70

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.89

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

1.00

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.33

-0.13

Drawdowns

BACIX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACIX drawdown since its inception was -77.81%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACIX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BACIXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.81%

-83.16%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-11.90%

+2.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.44%

-22.71%

+4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.76%

-35.33%

+9.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.65%

-35.33%

-30.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.73%

0.00%

-5.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.36%

-34.37%

+2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.06%

-0.04%

Volatility

BACIX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACIX) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) at 4.51%. This indicates that BACIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BACIXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

4.51%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

12.19%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

16.10%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.53%

23.06%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.21%

22.68%

+4.53%

BACIX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BACIX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

BACIX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

BACIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than NASDX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BACIX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
2.16%2.79%2.63%3.39%2.49%2.67%3.66%3.06%3.43%2.76%2.38%2.51%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
2.98%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


BACIX and NASDX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BACIX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to NASDX (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACIX dropped -77.81% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

NASDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BACIX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer