PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BACAX vs. MADVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BACAX vs. MADVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund (MADVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACAX achieves a 32.81% return, which is significantly higher than MADVX's 15.65% return. Over the past 10 years, BACAX has underperformed MADVX with an annualized return of 9.16%, while MADVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.81% annualized return.


BACAX

1D
1.10%
1M
10.86%
6M
18.00%
YTD
32.81%
1Y
41.22%
3Y*
15.06%
5Y*
21.36%
10Y*
9.16%
ALL TIME*
5.61%

MADVX

1D
0.90%
1M
1.02%
6M
11.69%
YTD
15.65%
1Y
28.55%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
11.05%
10Y*
11.81%
ALL TIME*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BACAX vs. MADVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BACAX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
32.81%10.53%3.78%2.61%43.02%42.93%-29.68%12.64%-19.98%2.07%
MADVX
BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund
15.65%21.70%6.98%12.71%-3.97%20.13%4.03%27.58%-7.15%16.31%

Correlation

The correlation between BACAX and MADVX is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2005

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between BACAX and MADVX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BACAX vs. MADVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BACAX
BACAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
BACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

MADVX
MADVX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MADVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MADVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MADVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MADVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MADVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BACAX vs. MADVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund (MADVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BACAXMADVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

2.88

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.75

12.34

-3.59

BACAX vs. MADVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the MADVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACAX and MADVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BACAX vs. MADVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACAX drawdown since its inception was -78.88%, which is greater than MADVX's maximum drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACAX and MADVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BACAXMADVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.88%

-50.00%

-28.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.36%

-9.01%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.73%

-15.22%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-18.05%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.92%

-35.94%

-29.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.02%

-0.22%

-2.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.08%

-5.27%

-28.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.50%

2.11%

+2.39%

Volatility

BACAX vs. MADVX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund (MADVX) at 3.39%. This indicates that BACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MADVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BACAXMADVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.88%

3.39%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.84%

9.42%

+5.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

11.84%

+6.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.37%

14.20%

+9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

16.30%

+10.86%

BACAX vs. MADVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BACAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than MADVX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

BACAX vs. MADVX - Dividend Comparison

BACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than MADVX's 14.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BACAX
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund
1.77%2.47%2.29%3.06%2.21%2.39%3.38%2.69%2.87%2.48%1.95%1.98%
MADVX
BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund
14.09%10.23%8.58%7.08%13.50%12.15%6.35%13.15%14.04%14.38%7.98%18.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


BACAX and MADVX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BACAX has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to MADVX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACAX dropped -78.88% vs MADVX's -50.00%.

MADVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BACAX and MADVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer