BACAX vs. JPM
BACAX (BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund) is Energy Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, BACAX returned 8.47%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for JPM. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BACAX vs. JPM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BACAX achieves a 27.26% return, which is significantly higher than JPM's -5.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BACAX has underperformed JPM with an annualized return of 8.47%, while JPM has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.
BACAX
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- -3.48%
- YTD
- 27.26%
- 6M
- 27.82%
- 1Y
- 40.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.58%
- 5Y*
- 18.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
JPM
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- -5.70%
- 6M
- -1.30%
- 1Y
- 15.93%
- 3Y*
- 31.89%
- 5Y*
- 15.50%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
BACAX vs. JPM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 27.26% | 10.53% | 3.78% | 2.61% | 43.02% | 42.93% | -29.68% | 12.64% | -19.98% | 2.07% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | -5.70% | 37.27% | 44.29% | 30.63% | -12.64% | 27.75% | -5.53% | 47.26% | -6.62% | 26.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between BACAX and JPM is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2005 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between BACAX and JPM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BACAX vs. JPM — Risk / Return Rank
BACAX
JPM
BACAX vs. JPM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BACAX | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | 0.75 | +1.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.18 | 1.10 | +2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.14 | +0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 1.05 | +3.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.00 | 2.52 | +11.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BACAX | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 0.75 | +1.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.72 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.34 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
BACAX vs. JPM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BACAX drawdown since its inception was -78.88%, roughly equal to the maximum JPM drawdown of -76.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACAX and JPM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BACAX | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.88% | -76.16% | -2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.11% | -15.47% | +6.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.73% | -24.42% | +5.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -38.77% | +13.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.92% | -43.63% | -22.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.07% | -9.60% | +2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.28% | -17.63% | -16.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 6.43% | -3.40% |
Volatility
BACAX vs. JPM - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) has a higher volatility of 6.90% compared to JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) at 6.55%. This indicates that BACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BACAX | JPM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 6.55% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.10% | 17.21% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.23% | 21.41% | -4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 24.41% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.21% | 27.38% | -0.17% |
Dividends
BACAX vs. JPM - Dividend Comparison
BACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than JPM's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund | 1.94% | 2.47% | 2.29% | 3.06% | 2.21% | 2.39% | 3.38% | 2.69% | 2.87% | 2.48% | 1.95% | 1.98% |
JPM JPMorgan Chase & Co. | 1.96% | 1.72% | 1.92% | 2.38% | 2.98% | 2.34% | 2.83% | 2.37% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.13% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BACAX and JPM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BACAX has higher volatility (6.90%) compared to JPM (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACAX dropped -78.88% vs JPM's -76.16%.
BACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BACAX and JPM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer