BACAX vs. FSENX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

BACAX (BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund) and FSENX (Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, BACAX returned 8.47%/yr vs 9.53%/yr for FSENX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. BACAX charges 1.32%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FSENX.

Performance

BACAX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BACAX achieves a 27.26% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 33.18% return. Over the past 10 years, BACAX has underperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 8.47%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.

BACAX

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: -3.48%
• YTD: 27.26%
• 6M: 27.82%
• 1Y: 40.66%
• 3Y*: 16.58%
• 5Y*: 18.13%
• 10Y*: 8.47%

FSENX

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: -3.20%
• YTD: 33.18%
• 6M: 32.58%
• 1Y: 51.56%
• 3Y*: 18.67%
• 5Y*: 21.84%
• 10Y*: 9.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BACAX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	27.26%	10.53%	3.78%	2.61%	43.02%	42.93%	-29.68%	12.64%	-19.98%	2.07%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	33.18%	10.56%	4.26%	0.94%	62.98%	55.31%	-32.51%	9.90%	-24.94%	-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between BACAX and FSENX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2005	0.97

The correlation between BACAX and FSENX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BACAX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BACAX

BACAX Risk / Return Rank: 70
BACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
BACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FSENX

FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BACAX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BACAX	FSENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.50	2.73	-0.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.46	-0.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.43	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	5.25	-0.60
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.00	15.56	-1.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BACAX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BACAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BACAX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BACAX	FSENX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.50	2.73	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	0.81	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.31	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.32	-0.14

Drawdowns

BACAX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BACAX drawdown since its inception was -78.88%, roughly equal to the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BACAX and FSENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BACAX	FSENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.88%	-76.24%	-2.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-9.95%	+0.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.73%	-25.85%	+7.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	-28.02%	+2.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-65.92%	-72.11%	+6.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.07%	-6.39%	-0.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.28%	-17.01%	-17.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.03%	3.36%	-0.33%

Volatility

BACAX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund (BACAX) is 6.90%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 7.48%. This indicates that BACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BACAX	FSENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.90%	7.48%	-0.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.10%	15.34%	-1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.23%	19.71%	-2.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.56%	27.27%	-3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.21%	30.96%	-3.75%

BACAX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BACAX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

BACAX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

BACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, more than FSENX's 1.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BACAX BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund	1.94%	2.47%	2.29%	3.06%	2.21%	2.39%	3.38%	2.69%	2.87%	2.48%	1.95%	1.98%
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio	1.61%	1.95%	1.95%	1.98%	2.50%	2.25%	3.43%	1.84%	1.48%	1.74%	0.62%	1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BACAX and FSENX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, BACAX and FSENX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BACAX or FSENX?

FSENX has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to BACAX (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BACAX dropped -78.88% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.