BABU vs. SOXS
BABU (Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - BABU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA), while SOXS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. BABU charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
BABU vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BABU
- 1D
- -4.55%
- 1M
- -37.71%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXS
- 1D
- 22.42%
- 1M
- -47.74%
- YTD
- -93.50%
- 6M
- -93.24%
- 1Y
- -97.76%
- 3Y*
- -87.41%
- 5Y*
- -80.25%
- 10Y*
- -79.54%
BABU vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BABU Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | -64.16% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -88.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between BABU and SOXS is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2026 | -0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BABU vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
BABU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOXS
BABU vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF (BABU) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BABU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.63 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -1.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.51 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BABU vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABU drawdown since its inception was -64.16%, smaller than the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABU and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.16% | -100.00% | +35.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -97.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -99.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -100.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.16% | -100.00% | +35.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.68% | -92.61% | +54.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 67.48% | — |
Volatility
BABU vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BABU | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 66.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 100.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 78.53% | 117.32% | -38.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 78.53% | 111.39% | -32.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.53% | 102.09% | -23.56% |
BABU vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BABU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
BABU vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
BABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than SOXS's 83.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BABU Direxion Daily BABA Bull 2X ETF | 1.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 83.05% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BABU and SOXS have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BABU is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BABU is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for SOXS.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 83.05%, compared with 1.12% for BABU.
BABU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SOXS is Inverse Equities. BABU tracks Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA), while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.97% for BABU and 1.08% for SOXS.
Find the right allocation for BABU and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer