PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BABO vs. HYTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BABO vs. HYTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABO achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than HYTI's 1.84% return.


BABO

1D
-1.54%
1M
-4.06%
YTD
-12.48%
6M
-16.80%
1Y
8.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HYTI

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.60%
YTD
1.84%
6M
2.45%
1Y
7.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABO vs. HYTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BABO and HYTI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BABO vs. HYTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABO
BABO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

HYTI
HYTI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HYTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HYTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABO vs. HYTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BABOHYTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.37

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

3.06

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.60

12.98

-12.38

BABO vs. HYTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BABO Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the HYTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BABO and HYTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BABOHYTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

1.90

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.32

-0.92

Drawdowns

BABO vs. HYTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABO drawdown since its inception was -29.37%, which is greater than HYTI's maximum drawdown of -4.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABO and HYTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BABOHYTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.37%

-4.47%

-24.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.37%

-2.38%

-26.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.47%

-0.05%

-26.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.68%

-0.46%

-13.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.49%

0.56%

+13.93%

Volatility

BABO vs. HYTI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) has a higher volatility of 12.03% compared to FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF (HYTI) at 1.14%. This indicates that BABO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BABOHYTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.03%

1.14%

+10.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.11%

3.02%

+21.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.12%

3.83%

+31.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.77%

5.22%

+31.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.77%

5.22%

+31.55%

BABO vs. HYTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than HYTI's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

BABO vs. HYTI - Dividend Comparison

BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.81%, more than HYTI's 10.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
BABO
YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF
85.81%85.50%20.65%
HYTI
FT Vest High Yield & Target Income ETF
10.40%8.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


BABO and HYTI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BABO has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to HYTI (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BABO dropped -29.37% vs HYTI's -4.47%.

On 1-year performance, BABO leads with 8.62% vs 7.25% for HYTI. On fees, HYTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, HYTI has been the lower-risk option at 1.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BABO has performed better with a 8.62% return vs 7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HYTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BABO.

BABO has the higher dividend yield at 85.81%, compared with 10.40% for HYTI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABO and 0.65% for HYTI.

HYTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BABO and HYTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer