BABO vs. CWII

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) and CWII (REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BABO charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for CWII.

Performance

BABO vs. CWII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BABO achieves a -28.18% return, which is significantly lower than CWII's 13,199.78% return.

BABO

• 1D: -2.04%
• 1M: -18.89%
• YTD: -28.18%
• 6M: -29.66%
• 1Y: -13.16%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CWII

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 10,273.16%
• YTD: 13,199.78%
• 6M: 12,082.72%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BABO vs. CWII - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	-28.18%	-7.66%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	13,199.78%	-45.06%

Correlation

The correlation between BABO and CWII is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

BABO vs. CWII — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BABO

BABO Risk / Return Rank: 6
BABO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BABO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
BABO Omega Ratio Rank: 6
BABO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BABO Martin Ratio Rank: 6

CWII

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BABO vs. CWII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF (BABO) and REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF (CWII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BABO	CWII	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	—	—

Drawdowns

BABO vs. CWII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BABO drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum CWII drawdown of -51.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABO and CWII.

Drawdown Indicators

	BABO	CWII	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.66%	-51.04%	+11.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.66%	0.00%	-39.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.24%	-33.26%	+19.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.49%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BABO	CWII	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.74%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.49%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.34%	13,701.30%	-13,665.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.54%	13,701.30%	-13,664.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.54%	13,701.30%	-13,664.76%

BABO vs. CWII - Expense Ratio Comparison

BABO has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than CWII's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

BABO vs. CWII - Dividend Comparison

BABO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.09%, less than CWII's 123.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BABO YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF	105.09%	85.50%	20.65%
CWII REX CRWV Growth & Income ETF	123.26%	6.09%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BABO and CWII in my portfolio?

BABO and CWII have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BABO or CWII?

On fees, BABO is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BABO or CWII?

BABO is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for CWII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BABO or CWII?

CWII has the higher dividend yield at 123.26%, compared with 105.09% for BABO.

What is the main difference between BABO and CWII?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BABO and 1.03% for CWII.