BABI.L vs. TLTI.L
Compare and contrast key facts about IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L).
BABI.L and TLTI.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BABI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025. TLTI.L is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Jun 27, 2025.
Performance
BABI.L vs. TLTI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BABI.L vs. TLTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | -31.12% | 0.62% |
TLTI.L IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP | -2.31% | -0.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BABI.L achieves a -31.12% return, which is significantly lower than TLTI.L's -2.31% return.
BABI.L
- 1D
- -5.89%
- 1M
- -16.53%
- YTD
- -31.12%
- 6M
- -45.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLTI.L
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -3.72%
- YTD
- -2.31%
- 6M
- -4.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BABI.L vs. TLTI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BABI.L and TLTI.L have an expense ratio of 0.55%.
Return for Risk
BABI.L vs. TLTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP (BABI.L) and IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP (TLTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BABI.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.05 | -0.34 | -0.71 |
Correlation
The correlation between BABI.L and TLTI.L is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BABI.L vs. TLTI.L - Dividend Comparison
BABI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than TLTI.L's 0.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BABI.L IncomeShares Alibaba (BABA) Options ETP | 0.39% | 0.09% |
TLTI.L IncomeShares 20+ Year Treasury (TLT) Options ETP | 0.07% | 0.02% |
Drawdowns
BABI.L vs. TLTI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BABI.L drawdown since its inception was -47.29%, which is greater than TLTI.L's maximum drawdown of -10.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BABI.L and TLTI.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BABI.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.29% | -10.31% | -36.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.29% | -8.28% | -39.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.07% | -3.90% | -11.17% |
Volatility
BABI.L vs. TLTI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BABI.L | TLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.20% | 10.49% | +25.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.20% | 10.49% | +25.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.20% | 10.49% | +25.71% |