BA.L vs. TAP
BA.L (BAE Systems plc) and TAP (Molson Coors Brewing Company) are both stocks. BA.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while TAP operates in Beverages - Brewers (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BA.L returned 18.87%/yr vs -5.56%/yr for TAP. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BA.L vs. TAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BA.L is traded in GBp, while TAP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TAP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BA.L achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly higher than TAP's -8.47% return. Over the past 10 years, BA.L has outperformed TAP with an annualized return of 18.87%, while TAP has yielded a comparatively lower -5.56% annualized return.
BA.L
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 12.71%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 0.36%
- 3Y*
- 28.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.87%
TAP
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- -8.47%
- 6M
- -10.91%
- 1Y
- -13.22%
- 3Y*
- -13.83%
- 5Y*
- -3.02%
- 10Y*
- -5.56%
BA.L vs. TAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 12.71% | 52.12% | 5.88% | 33.31% | 60.92% | 17.57% | -9.28% | 28.43% | -16.75% | 0.30% |
TAP Molson Coors Brewing Company | -8.47% | -21.55% | -1.74% | 16.05% | 28.00% | 5.10% | -17.69% | -4.22% | -25.73% | -21.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between BA.L and TAP is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2007 | 0.15 |
The correlation between BA.L and TAP shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BA.L:
£57.97B
TAP:
$7.88B
BA.L:
£1.33
TAP:
-$10.76
BA.L:
1.06
TAP:
0.73
BA.L:
4.92
TAP:
0.78
BA.L:
£54.65B
TAP:
$11.19B
BA.L:
£4.75B
TAP:
$4.23B
BA.L:
£7.55B
TAP:
-$1.54B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BA.L vs. TAP — Risk / Return Rank
BA.L
TAP
BA.L vs. TAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BA.L | TAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.93 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | -0.55 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | -1.15 | +1.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BA.L vs. TAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BA.L drawdown since its inception was -43.67%, smaller than the maximum TAP drawdown of -69.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA.L and TAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BA.L | TAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.67% | -69.48% | +25.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.30% | -26.68% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.30% | -42.64% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -42.64% | +21.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.80% | -69.48% | +31.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.12% | -56.11% | +38.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -27.33% | +14.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.84% | 12.61% | -2.77% |
Volatility
BA.L vs. TAP - Volatility Comparison
BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Molson Coors Brewing Company (TAP) at 7.20%. This indicates that BA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BA.L | TAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 7.20% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.43% | 20.43% | +3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.85% | 26.43% | +3.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 25.50% | +0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 28.65% | -3.58% |
Dividends
BA.L vs. TAP - Dividend Comparison
BA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, less than TAP's 4.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 1.90% | 1.99% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.99% | 4.40% | 4.75% | 4.00% | 4.79% | 3.75% | 3.57% | 4.14% |
TAP Molson Coors Brewing Company | 4.57% | 4.03% | 3.07% | 2.68% | 2.95% | 1.47% | 1.26% | 3.64% | 2.92% | 2.00% | 1.69% | 1.75% |
Financials
BA.L vs. TAP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems plc and Molson Coors Brewing Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BA.L vs. TAP - Profitability Comparison
BA.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
TAP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported a gross profit of 897.20M and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.
BA.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
TAP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported an operating income of 258.30M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
BA.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
TAP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Molson Coors Brewing Company reported a net income of 151.30M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 6.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BA.L and TAP have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BA.L and TAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer