BA.L vs. BUD
BA.L (BAE Systems plc) and BUD (Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV) are both stocks. BA.L operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while BUD operates in Beverages - Brewers (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, BA.L returned 18.87%/yr vs -1.20%/yr for BUD. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BA.L vs. BUD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
BA.L is traded in GBp, while BUD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BUD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BA.L achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly lower than BUD's 32.06% return. Over the past 10 years, BA.L has outperformed BUD with an annualized return of 18.87%, while BUD has yielded a comparatively lower -1.20% annualized return.
BA.L
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- 12.71%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- 1Y
- 0.36%
- 3Y*
- 28.80%
- 5Y*
- 32.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.87%
BUD
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 32.06%
- 6M
- 31.68%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- -1.20%
BA.L vs. BUD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 12.71% | 52.12% | 5.88% | 33.31% | 60.92% | 17.57% | -9.28% | 28.43% | -16.75% | 0.30% |
BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 32.06% | 21.04% | -20.00% | 3.59% | 11.99% | -11.83% | -16.49% | 22.83% | -35.16% | 0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between BA.L and BUD is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2009 | 0.23 |
The correlation between BA.L and BUD shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BA.L:
£57.97B
BUD:
$163.97B
BA.L:
£1.33
BUD:
$6.15
BA.L:
14.41
BUD:
13.48
BA.L:
2.30
BUD:
1.19
BA.L:
1.06
BUD:
1.37
BA.L:
4.92
BUD:
1.88
BA.L:
£54.65B
BUD:
$120.38B
BA.L:
£4.75B
BUD:
$67.02B
BA.L:
£7.55B
BUD:
$35.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BA.L vs. BUD — Risk / Return Rank
BA.L
BUD
BA.L vs. BUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BAE Systems plc (BA.L) and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BA.L | BUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.17 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 0.99 | -0.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.33 | 1.93 | -1.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BA.L vs. BUD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BA.L drawdown since its inception was -43.67%, smaller than the maximum BUD drawdown of -67.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BA.L and BUD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BA.L | BUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.67% | -67.42% | +23.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.30% | -19.83% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.30% | -28.79% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -30.20% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.80% | -67.42% | +29.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.12% | -27.37% | +10.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -24.32% | +11.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.84% | 10.15% | -0.31% |
Volatility
BA.L vs. BUD - Volatility Comparison
BAE Systems plc (BA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) at 6.41%. This indicates that BA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BA.L | BUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.48% | 6.41% | +2.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.43% | 17.65% | +5.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.85% | 25.98% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.82% | 23.21% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.07% | 26.71% | -1.64% |
Dividends
BA.L vs. BUD - Dividend Comparison
BA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%, more than BUD's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BA.L BAE Systems plc | 1.90% | 1.99% | 2.69% | 2.53% | 2.99% | 4.40% | 4.75% | 4.00% | 4.79% | 3.75% | 3.57% | 4.14% |
BUD Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.74% | 1.28% | 0.88% | 0.98% | 0.79% | 2.45% | 5.15% | 3.63% | 5.41% | 3.21% |
Financials
BA.L vs. BUD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BAE Systems plc and Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BA.L vs. BUD - Profitability Comparison
BA.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.2%.
BUD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a gross profit of 17.10B and revenue of 30.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.
BA.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.2%.
BUD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported an operating income of 80.56M and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
BA.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BAE Systems plc reported a net income of 1.09B and revenue of 14.77B, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.
BUD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV reported a net income of 3.01B and revenue of 30.61B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BA.L and BUD have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for BA.L and BUD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer