PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF (B500.DE) and iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, B500.DE achieves a 8.94% return, which is significantly lower than 2B7B.DE's 12.98% return.


B500.DE

1D
0.86%
1M
5.03%
YTD
8.94%
6M
9.45%
1Y
20.46%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
12.79%

2B7B.DE

1D
-0.32%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
12.98%
6M
16.62%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
B500.DE
Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF
8.94%4.76%20.85%12.10%-7.18%47.02%-4.65%34.36%-4.54%5.27%
2B7B.DE
iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF
12.98%-1.07%5.24%8.58%-7.10%39.56%8.41%25.77%-11.22%6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between B500.DE and 2B7B.DE is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017

0.80

The correlation between B500.DE and 2B7B.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

B500.DE
B500.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
B500.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B500.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
B500.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
B500.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
B500.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

2B7B.DE
2B7B.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
2B7B.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2B7B.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
2B7B.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
2B7B.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
2B7B.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF (B500.DE) and iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


B500.DE2B7B.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.18

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.30

1.58

+2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

4.68

+6.48

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current B500.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the 2B7B.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of B500.DE and 2B7B.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


B500.DE2B7B.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

1.04

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.34

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.45

+0.07

Drawdowns

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum B500.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.49%, which is greater than 2B7B.DE's maximum drawdown of -34.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for B500.DE and 2B7B.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


B500.DE2B7B.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.49%

-34.61%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.75%

-10.19%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.66%

-24.54%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.66%

-24.54%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.44%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.31%

-6.21%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

3.44%

-1.61%

Volatility

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi S&P 500 Buyback ETF (B500.DE) is 2.99%, while iShares V PLC - iShares S&P 500 Materials Sector UCITS ETF (2B7B.DE) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that B500.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B7B.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


B500.DE2B7B.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

4.84%

-1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

12.31%

-4.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

15.43%

-3.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

17.20%

-1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

19.16%

-0.20%

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both B500.DE and 2B7B.DE have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

B500.DE vs. 2B7B.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither B500.DE nor 2B7B.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


B500.DE and 2B7B.DE have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

B500.DE and 2B7B.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

B500.DE is categorized as S&P 500, while 2B7B.DE is Materials. B500.DE tracks S&P 500 Buyback NTR, while 2B7B.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Materials Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for B500.DE and 2B7B.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer