PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
B4NQ.DE vs. PICK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC (B4NQ.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

B4NQ.DE is traded in EUR, while PICK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PICK values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, B4NQ.DE achieves a 11.11% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 14.60% return.


B4NQ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.14%
6M
4.37%
YTD
11.11%
1Y
44.98%
3Y*
16.57%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*

PICK

1D
-1.07%
1M
-10.96%
6M
5.11%
YTD
14.60%
1Y
50.21%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
13.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
B4NQ.DE
BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC
11.11%27.66%11.19%-0.03%-5.09%34.69%13.14%3.20%-5.67%12.51%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
14.60%33.87%-10.85%6.40%8.90%31.78%16.95%19.10%-14.83%23.15%

Correlation

The correlation between B4NQ.DE and PICK is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2017

0.40

Over the past year, B4NQ.DE and PICK have become more correlated (0.60) than their long-term average of 0.40, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

B4NQ.DE
B4NQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
B4NQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B4NQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
B4NQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
B4NQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
B4NQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

PICK
PICK Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PICK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PICK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PICK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PICK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PICK Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC (B4NQ.DE) and iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


B4NQ.DEPICKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.31

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.76

2.71

+2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.98

8.82

+7.17

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current B4NQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the PICK Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of B4NQ.DE and PICK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum B4NQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.51%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -62.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for B4NQ.DE and PICK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


B4NQ.DEPICKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.51%

-62.66%

+35.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-18.63%

+9.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.98%

-33.12%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-34.40%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

-15.49%

+13.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.95%

-19.01%

+9.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

5.71%

-2.90%

Volatility

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC (B4NQ.DE) is 4.01%, while iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that B4NQ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


B4NQ.DEPICKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

9.27%

-5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.32%

24.38%

-7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.83%

27.98%

-6.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

25.98%

-5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.68%

27.09%

-7.41%

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison

B4NQ.DE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

B4NQ.DE vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison

B4NQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PICK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
B4NQ.DE
BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PICK
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
2.33%2.88%3.26%4.19%6.93%5.89%2.27%5.51%4.77%2.41%1.15%15.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


B4NQ.DE and PICK have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PICK is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PICK is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for B4NQ.DE.

B4NQ.DE tracks LME Copper Futures, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers ex Gold and Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for B4NQ.DE and 0.39% for PICK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for B4NQ.DE and PICK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer