PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
B4NQ.DE vs. META.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC (B4NQ.DE) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

B4NQ.DE is traded in EUR, while META.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the META.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with B4NQ.DE having a 12.61% return and META.L slightly lower at 11.99%.


B4NQ.DE

1D
0.20%
1M
5.53%
YTD
12.61%
6M
20.58%
1Y
43.15%
3Y*
17.04%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*

META.L

1D
-0.44%
1M
4.31%
YTD
11.99%
6M
17.58%
1Y
28.73%
3Y*
8.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
B4NQ.DE
BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC
12.61%27.66%11.19%-0.03%11.35%
META.L
WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced
12.00%3.10%10.65%-10.90%9.26%

Correlation

The correlation between B4NQ.DE and META.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.74

The correlation between B4NQ.DE and META.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

B4NQ.DE
B4NQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
B4NQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B4NQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
B4NQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
B4NQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
B4NQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

META.L
META.L Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
META.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
META.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
META.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
META.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC (B4NQ.DE) and WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


B4NQ.DEMETA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.33

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.70

3.77

+0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.53

12.72

+2.81

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current B4NQ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the META.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of B4NQ.DE and META.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


B4NQ.DEMETA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

1.85

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.35

+0.19

Drawdowns

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum B4NQ.DE drawdown since its inception was -29.78%, which is greater than META.L's maximum drawdown of -20.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for B4NQ.DE and META.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


B4NQ.DEMETA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.78%

-20.90%

-8.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.40%

-7.59%

-1.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.98%

-20.90%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-1.27%

+0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-10.42%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.25%

+0.60%

Volatility

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L - Volatility Comparison

BNPP Kupfer (TR) ETC (B4NQ.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.45% compared to WisdomTree Industrial Metals Enhanced (META.L) at 4.24%. This indicates that B4NQ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


B4NQ.DEMETA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.45%

4.24%

+1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.83%

12.89%

+5.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.66%

15.45%

+6.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.13%

16.65%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.30%

16.65%

+3.65%

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

B4NQ.DE has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than META.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

B4NQ.DE vs. META.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither B4NQ.DE nor META.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


B4NQ.DE and META.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, META.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

META.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for B4NQ.DE.

B4NQ.DE tracks LME Copper Futures, while META.L tracks Optimised Roll Industrial Metals. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for B4NQ.DE and 0.40% for META.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for B4NQ.DE and META.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer