PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
B vs. NEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

B vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, B achieves a -6.52% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 0.82% return. Over the past 10 years, B has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 9.32%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.80% annualized return.


B

1D
2.81%
1M
-10.03%
YTD
-6.52%
6M
-5.53%
1Y
96.46%
3Y*
36.83%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
9.32%

NEM

1D
2.71%
1M
-15.55%
YTD
0.82%
6M
2.58%
1Y
81.14%
3Y*
36.14%
5Y*
10.51%
10Y*
13.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

B vs. NEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
-6.52%186.91%-12.29%7.86%-6.81%-14.75%24.60%38.45%-5.01%-8.80%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
0.82%172.82%-7.83%-8.76%-20.77%7.40%40.28%30.52%-6.15%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between B and NEM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 1985

0.74

The correlation between B and NEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

B:

$3.59

NEM:

$6.34

PE Ratio

B:

11.18

NEM:

15.82

PEG Ratio

B:

1.13

NEM:

0.41

PS Ratio

B:

3.59

NEM:

4.83

Total Revenue (TTM)

B:

$19.00B

NEM:

$17.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

B:

$10.32B

NEM:

$8.97B

EBITDA (TTM)

B:

$12.63B

NEM:

$13.78B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

B vs. NEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

B
B Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
B Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
B Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
B Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
NEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
NEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
NEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

B vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and Newmont Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

2.78

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

7.58

+0.36

B vs. NEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current B Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of B and NEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

B vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum B drawdown since its inception was -88.51%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -81.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for B and NEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.51%

-81.30%

-7.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.31%

-29.39%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.31%

-36.57%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.96%

-62.40%

+14.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.13%

-62.40%

+5.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.16%

-23.71%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.28%

-41.37%

+4.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.18%

10.73%

+1.45%

Volatility

B vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and Newmont Corporation (NEM) have volatilities of 15.80% and 15.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.80%

15.74%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.19%

37.43%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.31%

47.44%

-2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.25%

37.99%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.85%

35.67%

+1.18%

Dividends

B vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, more than NEM's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
2.29%1.21%2.58%2.21%3.20%2.47%1.82%0.70%1.40%0.83%0.50%1.90%
NEM
Newmont Corporation
1.02%1.00%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%

Financials

B vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Mining Corporation and Newmont Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
5.18B
0
(B) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


B and NEM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

B has higher volatility (15.80%) compared to NEM (15.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, B dropped -88.51% vs NEM's -81.30%.

B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for B and NEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer