PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
B vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

B vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, B achieves a -6.52% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 15.29% return. Over the past 10 years, B has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 9.32%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.92% annualized return.


B

1D
2.81%
1M
-10.03%
YTD
-6.52%
6M
-5.53%
1Y
96.46%
3Y*
36.83%
5Y*
14.31%
10Y*
9.32%

AMLP

1D
-0.34%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
15.29%
6M
14.35%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
6.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

B vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
-6.52%186.91%-12.29%7.86%-6.81%-14.75%24.60%38.45%-5.01%-8.80%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
15.29%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between B and AMLP is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010

0.16

The correlation between B and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

B vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

B
B Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
B Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
B Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
B Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
B Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

B vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Mining Corporation (B) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BAMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.22

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.66

+1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.95

5.35

+2.59

B vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current B Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of B and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

B vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum B drawdown since its inception was -88.51%, which is greater than AMLP's maximum drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for B and AMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.51%

-77.19%

-11.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.31%

-8.94%

-20.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.31%

-14.27%

-15.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.96%

-20.92%

-27.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.13%

-72.62%

+15.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.16%

-4.94%

-18.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.28%

-17.37%

-19.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.18%

2.77%

+9.41%

Volatility

B vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

Barrick Mining Corporation (B) has a higher volatility of 15.80% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 4.71%. This indicates that B's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.80%

4.71%

+11.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.19%

8.77%

+26.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.31%

11.84%

+33.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.25%

19.95%

+16.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.85%

27.67%

+9.18%

Dividends

B vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than AMLP's 7.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.71%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
2.29%1.21%2.58%2.21%3.20%2.47%1.82%0.70%1.40%0.83%0.50%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


B and AMLP have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

B has higher volatility (15.80%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, B dropped -88.51% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for B and AMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer