AZTD vs. VXUS
AZTD (Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both Global Equities funds - AZTD tracks the Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross while VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AZTD returned 17.68%/yr vs 19.55%/yr for VXUS. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AZTD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
AZTD vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AZTD having a 13.87% return and VXUS slightly higher at 14.45%.
AZTD
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 13.87%
- 6M
- 15.86%
- 1Y
- 25.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 14.45%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 31.38%
- 3Y*
- 19.55%
- 5Y*
- 8.49%
- 10Y*
- 9.69%
AZTD vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF | 13.87% | 25.46% | 6.87% | 10.34% | -1.54% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.45% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AZTD and VXUS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between AZTD and VXUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
AZTD vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AZTD
VXUS
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
AZTD
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
AZTD
VXUS
Industrials
AZTD
VXUS
Financial Services
AZTD
VXUS
Healthcare
AZTD
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
AZTD
VXUS
Basic Materials
AZTD
VXUS
Utilities
AZTD
VXUS
Communication Services
AZTD
VXUS
Energy
AZTD
VXUS
Real Estate
AZTD
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AZTD vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
AZTD
VXUS
AZTD vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AZTD | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | 2.80 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | 10.92 | -3.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AZTD | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.08 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.39 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
AZTD vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AZTD | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.75% | -35.97% | +19.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.19% | -11.27% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.75% | -13.58% | -3.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.93% | -0.82% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -8.22% | +4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.37% | 2.88% | +0.49% |
Volatility
AZTD vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) is 5.06%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that AZTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AZTD | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 5.46% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 13.00% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.35% | 15.20% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 16.04% | +2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 17.15% | +1.40% |
AZTD vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
AZTD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AZTD vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than VXUS's 2.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF | 0.92% | 1.05% | 1.87% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.65% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AZTD and VXUS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to AZTD (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AZTD dropped -16.75% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 3-year performance, VXUS leads with 19.55% vs 17.68% for AZTD. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, AZTD has been the lower-risk option at 5.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 19.55% return vs 17.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AZTD.
VXUS has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.92% for AZTD.
AZTD tracks Solactive Aztlan Global Developed Markets SMID Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AZTD and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AZTD and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer