AZTD vs. PJBF

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

AZTD (Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF) and PJBF (PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AZTD is passively managed, while PJBF is actively managed. AZTD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for PJBF.

Performance

AZTD vs. PJBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AZTD

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 11.86%
• YTD: 14.80%
• 1Y: 23.76%
• 3Y*: 16.04%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PJBF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AZTD vs. PJBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	0.04%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%

AZTD vs. PJBF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AZTD	PJBF
Consumer Cyclical	21.1%	13.8%
Technology	20.7%	40.0%
Industrials	17.9%	16.5%
Financial Services	14.6%	2.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	11.5%
Energy	5.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	2.3%
Communication Services	3.9%	11.5%
Basic Materials	3.6%	-
Utilities	3.6%	2.0%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

AZTD vs. PJBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AZTD

AZTD Risk / Return Rank: 48
AZTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
AZTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AZTD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
AZTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AZTD Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PJBF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AZTD vs. PJBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF (AZTD) and PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF (PJBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AZTD	PJBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	—	—

Drawdowns

AZTD vs. PJBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AZTD drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, which is greater than PJBF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AZTD and PJBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	AZTD	PJBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.75%	0.00%	-16.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.48%	0.00%	-2.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	0.00%	-3.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AZTD	PJBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.93%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.68%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	0.00%	+17.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.50%	0.00%	+18.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	0.00%	+18.50%

AZTD vs. PJBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

AZTD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PJBF's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

AZTD vs. PJBF - Dividend Comparison

AZTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while PJBF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AZTD Aztlan Global Stock Selection Dm SMID ETF	0.92%	1.05%	1.87%	0.12%
PJBF PGIM Jennison Better Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AZTD or PJBF?

On fees, PJBF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AZTD or PJBF?

PJBF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AZTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AZTD or PJBF?

AZTD has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.00% for PJBF.

What is the main difference between AZTD and PJBF?

They also come from different issuers: Aztlan and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AZTD and 0.59% for PJBF.